ArticlePain2016
What reliability can and cannot tell us about pain report and pain neuroimaging.
Article in Pain, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Great Expectations: A Critical Review of and Suggestions for the Study of Reward Processing as a Cause and Predictor of Depression.Biological psychiatry · 2021Pooled it
- Placebo Effects on the Neurologic Pain Signature: A Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data.JAMA neurology · 2018Pooled it
- Nature exposure induces analgesic effects by acting on nociception-related neural processing.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Reliability of task-based fMRI in the dorsal horn of the human spinal cord.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Effect sizes and test-retest reliability of the fMRI-based neurologic pain signature.NeuroImage · 2022Article
- Altered Intrinsic Brain Activity in Patients With Toothache Using the Percent Amplitude of a Fluctuation Method: A Resting-State fMRI Study.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Article
- Boost in Test-Retest Reliability in Resting State fMRI with Predictive Modeling.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2021Article
- Functional MRI Can Be Highly Reliable, but It Depends on What You Measure: A Commentary on Elliott et al. (2020).Psychological science · 2021Article
- Test-retest reliability of laser evoked pain perception and fMRI BOLD responses.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Affective brain patterns as multivariate neural correlates of cardiovascular disease risk.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2020Article
- Toward a unified framework for interpreting machine-learning models in neuroimaging.Nature protocols · 2020Article
- Response to "Treating patients rather than their functional neuroimages" (Br J Anaesth 2018; 121: 969-71).British journal of anaesthesia · 2019Article
- A Brain Phenotype for Stressor-Evoked Blood Pressure Reactivity.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2017Article
- Article
- Article
- From maps to models: A survey on the reliability of small studies of task-based fMRI.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26645548What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.