ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2015
Characterizing the vulnerability of frequent emergency department users by applying a conceptual framework: a controlled, cross-sectional study.
Article in International journal for equity in health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03641274 (Implementing a Case Management Intervention for Frequent Users of the Emergency Department), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Implementing a Case Management Intervention for Frequent Users of the Emergency Department: An Effectiveness-Implementation Hybrid Trial Study Protocol
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Blood-borne virus testing in European emergency departments: current evidence and service considerations.European journal of public health · 2025Pooled it
- Characteristics of Case Management in Primary Care Associated With Positive Outcomes for Frequent Users of Health Care: A Systematic Review.Annals of family medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Case management programs in emergency department to reduce frequent user visits: a systematic review.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2019Pooled it
- Using case management in a universal health coverage system to improve quality of life of frequent Emergency Department users: a randomized controlled trial.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2018Trial
- Case Management may Reduce Emergency Department Frequent use in a Universal Health Coverage System: a Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of general internal medicine · 2017Trial
- Article
- Migration context of emergency department patients and patterns of their in- and outpatient healthcare utilization - analysis of three INDEED study centers in Berlin.BMC public health · 2025Article
- [Black box: Attenders with psychosocial needs in the emergency department].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2024Article
- Experiences of Frequent Users of Emergency Departments in Health Care Setting in French-Speaking Switzerland: A Qualitative Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- VirA+EmiC project: Evaluating real-world effectiveness and sustainability of integrated routine opportunistic hepatitis B and C testing in a large urban emergency department.Journal of viral hepatitis · 2022Article
- Does Case Management Provide Support for Staff Facing Frequent Users of Emergency Departments? A Comparative Mixed-Method Evaluation of ED Staff Perception.BMC emergency medicine · 2021Article
- Care and cost trajectories of asylum seekers in a nurse-led, patient centered, care network in Switzerland.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Psychometric properties of modified MOS social support survey 5-item (MSSS-5-item) among Iranian older adults.BMC geriatrics · 2021Article
- Qualitative evaluation of primary care providers' experiences caring for frequent users of the emergency department.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Predictors of Recurrent High Emergency Department Use among Patients with Mental Disorders.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Measuring Health Equity in Emergency Care Using Routinely Collected Data: A Systematic Review.Health equity · 2021Review
- Characterization of high healthcare utilizer groups using administrative data from an electronic medical record database.BMC health services research · 2019Article
- Difficult patient-doctor encounters in a Swiss university outpatient clinic: cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2019Article
- Implementing a case management intervention for frequent users of the emergency department (I-CaM): an effectiveness-implementation hybrid trial study protocol.BMC health services research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFrequent emergency department (ED) users meet several of the criteria of vulnerability, but this needs to be further examined taking into consideration all vulnerability's different dimensions. This study aimed to characterize frequent ED users and to define risk factors of frequent ED use within a universal health care coverage system, applying a conceptual framework of vulnerability.
methodsA controlled, cross-sectional study comparing frequent ED users to a control group of non-frequent users was conducted at the Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland. Frequent users were defined as patients with five or more visits to the ED in the previous 12 months. The two groups were compared using validated scales for each one of the five dimensions of an innovative conceptual framework: socio-demographic characteristics; somatic, mental, and risk-behavior indicators; and use of health care services. Independent t-tests, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, Pearson's Chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test were used for the comparison. To examine the -related to vulnerability- risk factors for being a frequent ED user, univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used.
resultsWe compared 226 frequent users and 173 controls. Frequent users had more vulnerabilities in all five dimensions of the conceptual framework. They were younger, and more often immigrants from low/middle-income countries or unemployed, had more somatic and psychiatric comorbidities, were more often tobacco users, and had more primary care physician (PCP) visits. The most significant frequent ED use risk factors were a history of more than three hospital admissions in the previous 12 months (adj OR:23.2, 95%CI = 9.1-59.2), the absence of a PCP (adj OR:8.4, 95%CI = 2.1-32.7), living less than 5 km from an ED (adj OR:4.4, 95%CI = 2.1-9.0), and household income lower than USD 2,800/month (adj OR:4.3, 95%CI = 2.0-9.2).
conclusionsFrequent ED users within a universal health coverage system form a highly vulnerable population, when taking into account all five dimensions of a conceptual framework of vulnerability. The predictive factors identified could be useful in the early detection of future frequent users, in order to address their specific needs and decrease vulnerability, a key priority for health care policy makers. Application of the conceptual framework in future research is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.