Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26645090›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical psychology in medical settings2015

Capturing Psychologists' Work in Integrated Care: Measuring and Documenting Administrative Outcomes.

Lisa K Kearney, Clifford A Smith, Andrew S Pomerantz

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lisa K KearneyDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Office of Mental Health Operations, VACO - Office of Mental Health Operations, c/o VISN 17 Mental Health Office - Plaza Lecea, 5441 Babcock Road, Suite 300, San Antonio, TX, 78240, USA. Lisa.Kearney3@va.gov.
Clifford A SmithIron Mountain VA Medical Center, Iron Mountain, MI, USA. Clifford.Smith2@va.gov.
Andrew S PomerantzDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Mental Health Services, Washington, DC, USA. Andrew.Pomerantz@va.gov.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the expansion of integrated primary care and the increased focus on fiscal sustainability, it is critical for clinical managers of these innovative systems to have practical methods for measuring administrative outcomes. Administrative outcomes will assist leadership in the development of efficient, streamlined clinics to provide services to the primary care population. Additionally, administrative measures can be utilized to provide information to assist in guiding resource utilization and management decisions. Several administrative outcomes are suggested for integrated primary care managers to consider for application, including: clinic utilization measures, integrated care administrative measures, wait time and access metrics, and productivity monitors. Effective utilization of these measures can help office managers and clinic leadership not only to maximize patient care, but also to enhance essential business operations, which increase the long-term sustainability of integrated primary care programs.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health Care, IntegratedHumansPrimary Health CarePsychology, ClinicalAccessClinic administrationIntegrated careProductivity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.