ArticleInternational journal of mass spectrometry2015
In-Source Decay Characterization of Isoaspartate and β-Peptides.
Article in International journal of mass spectrometry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multi-attribute monitoring (MAM) methodology for glycosylated subunit vaccines.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Differentiation of Aspartic and Isoaspartic Acid Using 193 nm Ultraviolet Photodissociation Mass Spectrometry.Analytical chemistry · 2023Article
- Evaluation of Sibling and Twin Fragment Ions Improves the Structural Characterization of Proteins by Top-Down MALDI In-Source Decay Mass Spectrometry.Analytical chemistry · 2020Article
- General Mechanism of CJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2019Article
- Evaluation of MALDI-TOF/TOF Mass Spectrometry Approach for Quantitative Determination of Aspartate Residue Isomerization in the Amyloid-β Peptide.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2019Article
- Gas Phase Ion Chemistry to Determine Isoaspartate in a Peptide Backbone.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Deamidation and the subsequent formation of isoaspartic acid (isoAsp) are common modifications of asparagine (Asn) residues in proteins. Differentiation of isoAsp and Asp residues is a challenging task owing to their similar chemical properties and identical molecular mass. Recent studies showed that they can be differentiated using electron capture dissociation (ECD) which generates diagnostic fragments
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.