Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26644612›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2015

Comparative study of two doses of intrathecal dexmedetomidine as adjuvant with low dose hyperbaric bupivacaine in ambulatory perianal surgeries: A prospective randomised controlled study.

K Sudheesh, Rs Raghavendra Rao, M Kavya, J Aarthi, D Devika Rani, S S Nethra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

K SudheeshDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Rs Raghavendra RaoDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
M KavyaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
J AarthiDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
D Devika RaniDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
S S NethraDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsDexmedetomidine (DMT), as intrathecal adjuvant has been shown to successfully prolong duration of analgesia but delay the motor recovery. Hence, this study was designed to find out the dose of DMT which can provide satisfactory analgesia without prolonging motor block.

methodsA total of 50 patients scheduled for elective perianal surgeries were randomly allocated to Groups C or D (n = 25). Group D received hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% 4 mg + DMT 5 μg and Group C received hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% 4 mg + DMT 3 μg intrathecally. Onset and duration of sensory and motor blockade, duration of analgesia, time for ambulation and first urination were recorded. Adverse effects if any were noted.

resultsDemographic characters, duration of surgery were comparable. The onset of sensory block to S1 was 9.61 ± 5.53 min in Group C compared to 7.69 ± 4.80 min in Group D (P = 0.35). Duration of sensory (145.28 ± 83.17 min - C, 167.85 ± 93.75 min - D, P = 0.5) and motor block (170.53 ± 73.44 min - C, 196.14 ± 84.28 min, P = 0.39) were comparable. Duration of analgesia (337.86 ± 105.11 min - C, 340.78 ± 101.81 min - D, P = 0.9) and time for ambulation (252.46 ± 93.72 min - C, 253.64 ± 88.04 min - D, P = 0.97) were also comparable. One patient in each group had urinary retention requiring catheterization. No other side effects were observed.

conclusionIntrathecal DMT 3 μg dose does not produce faster ambulation compared to intrathecal DMT 5 μg though it produces comparable duration of analgesia for perianal surgeries.

Indexed as

Ambulatorydexmedetomidineintrathecalmotor blockperianal surgeries

Identifiers

PMID26644612
PMCPMC4645353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.