Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26644478›Full record

ReviewGenetics2015

Rendering the Intractable More Tractable: Tools from Caenorhabditis elegans Ripe for Import into Parasitic Nematodes.

Jordan D Ward

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. AdvancingPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Dry-freezingmicroPublication biology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Caenorhabditis elegans in anthelmintic research - Old model, new perspectives.International journal for parasitology. Drugs and drug resistance · 2020
    Review
  10. Chemosensory mechanisms of host seeking and infectivity in skin-penetrating nematodes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. TheGenetics · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jordan D WardDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, California 94158.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9870-8936

Funding

Transcriptional networks controlling molting in C. elegans and B. malayiK99GM107345 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI WARD, JORDAN DAVID · 2014 to 2015
$180k
NIGMS NIH HHS K99 GM107345NIGMS NIH HHS K99GM107345
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent and rapid advances in genetic and molecular tools have brought spectacular tractability to Caenorhabditis elegans, a model that was initially prized because of its simple design and ease of imaging. C. elegans has long been a powerful model in biomedical research, and tools such as RNAi and the CRISPR/Cas9 system allow facile knockdown of genes and genome editing, respectively. These developments have created an additional opportunity to tackle one of the most debilitating burdens on global health and food security: parasitic nematodes. I review how development of nonparasitic nematodes as genetic models informs efforts to import tools into parasitic nematodes. Current tools in three commonly studied parasites (Strongyloides spp., Brugia malayi, and Ascaris suum) are described, as are tools from C. elegans that are ripe for adaptation and the benefits and barriers to doing so. These tools will enable dissection of a huge array of questions that have been all but completely impenetrable to date, allowing investigation into host-parasite and parasite-vector interactions, and the genetic basis of parasitism.

Indexed as

Genetic TechniquesAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansHumansNematodaParasitologyC. elegansCRISPRparasitic nematodetool development

Identifiers

PMID26644478
PMCPMC4676526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.