Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26644354›Full record

ArticleNew biotechnology2016

Developing high-quality mouse monoclonal antibodies for neuroscience research - approaches, perspectives and opportunities.

Belvin Gong, Karl D Murray, James S Trimmer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in New biotechnology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Channels (Austin, Tex.) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Electrically Silent Kv5.1 Subunit Forms Heteromeric Kv2 Channels in Cortical Neurons and Confers Distinct Functional Properties.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Recombinant Antibodies in Basic Neuroscience Research.Current protocols in neuroscience · 2020
    Review
  20. BRAIN Initiative: Cutting-Edge Tools and Resources for the Community.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Belvin GongDepartment of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, United States.
Karl D MurrayDepartment of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, United States; Center for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, United States.
James S TrimmerDepartment of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, United States; Department of Physiology and Membrane Biology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Davis, CA 95616, United States. Electronic address: jtrimmer@ucdavis.edu.

Funding

UC Davis/NIH NeuroMab FacilityU24NS050606 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI TRIMMER, JAMES S · 2005 to 2014
$15.6M
UC Davis/NIH NeuroMab Facility-Administrative SupplementR24NS092991 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI TRIMMER, JAMES S · 2015 to 2018
$1.1M
NINDS NIH HHS R24 NS092991NINDS NIH HHS U24 NS050606
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-quality antibodies (Abs) are critical to neuroscience research, as they remain the primary affinity proteomics reagent used to label and capture endogenously expressed protein targets in the nervous system. As in other fields, neuroscientists are frequently confronted with inaccurate and irreproducible Ab-based results and/or reporting. The UC Davis/NIH NeuroMab Facility was created with the mission of addressing the unmet need for high-quality Abs in neuroscience research by applying a unique approach to generate and validate mouse monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) optimized for use against mammalian brain (i.e., NeuroMabs). Here we describe our methodology of multi-step mAb screening focused on identifying mAbs exhibiting efficacy and specificity in labeling mammalian brain samples. We provide examples from NeuroMab screens, and from the subsequent specialized validation of those selected as NeuroMabs. We highlight the particular challenges and considerations of determining specificity for brain immunolabeling. We also describe why our emphasis on extensive validation of large numbers of candidates by immunoblotting and immunohistochemistry against brain samples is essential for identifying those that exhibit efficacy and specificity in those applications to become NeuroMabs. We describe the special attention given to candidates with less common non-IgG1 IgG subclasses that can facilitate simultaneous multiplex labeling with subclass-specific secondary antibodies. We detail our recent use of recombinant cloning of NeuroMabs as a method to archive all NeuroMabs, to unambiguously define NeuroMabs at the DNA sequence level, and to re-engineer IgG1 NeuroMabs to less common IgG subclasses to facilitate their use in multiplex labeling. Finally, we provide suggestions to facilitate Ab development and use, as to design, execution and interpretation of Ab-based neuroscience experiments. Reproducibility in neuroscience research will improve with enhanced Ab validation, unambiguous identification of Abs used in published experiments, and end user proficiency in Ab-based assays.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAnimalsAntibody SpecificityBiotechnologyEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHumansImmunizationImmunoglobulin GMiceMice, Inbred BALB CNerve Tissue ProteinsNervous SystemPeptide FragmentsProteomicsRatsAntibodies, MonoclonalImmunoglobulin GNerve Tissue ProteinsPeptide FragmentsRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26644354
PMCPMC4884554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.