ArticleNew biotechnology2016
Developing high-quality mouse monoclonal antibodies for neuroscience research - approaches, perspectives and opportunities.
Article in New biotechnology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Open-source antibodies as a path to enhanced research reproducibility and transparency.New biotechnology · 2025Article
- clonevdjseq: A workflow and bioinformatics management system for sequencing, archiving, and analysis of VDJ sequences from clonal libraries.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Multimerized epitope tags for high-sensitivity protein detection.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
- YCharOS protocol for antibody validation.Nature protocols · 2025Article
- The Electrically Silent Kv5.1 Subunit Forms Heteromeric Kv2 Channels in Cortical Neurons and Confers Distinct Functional Properties.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Antibody characterization is critical to enhance reproducibility in biomedical research.eLife · 2024Review
- Multiplexed volumetric CLEM enabled by scFvs provides insights into the cytology of cerebellar cortex.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Best practices for managing and disseminating resources and outreach and evaluating the impact of the IDG Consortium.Drug discovery today · 2024Article
- Application of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to detect antimicrobial peptides in human intestinal lumen.Journal of immunological methods · 2024Article
- Developing a Toolbox of Antibodies Validated for Array Tomography-Based Imaging of Brain Synapses.eNeuro · 2023Article
- Developing a Toolbox of Antibodies Validated for Array Tomography-Based Imaging of Brain Synapses.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- High-volume hybridoma sequencing on the NeuroMabSeq platform enables efficient generation of recombinant monoclonal antibodies and scFvs for neuroscience research.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Neuronal ER-plasma membrane junctions couple excitation to CaNature communications · 2023Article
- NeuroMabSeq: high volume acquisition, processing, and curation of hybridoma sequences and their use in generating recombinant monoclonal antibodies and scFvs for neuroscience research.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Highly multiplexed immunofluorescence of the human kidney using co-detection by indexing.Kidney international · 2022Article
- Article
- Development, Screening, and Validation of Camelid-Derived Nanobodies for Neuroscience Research.Current protocols in neuroscience · 2020Article
- Recombinant Antibodies in Basic Neuroscience Research.Current protocols in neuroscience · 2020Review
- BRAIN Initiative: Cutting-Edge Tools and Resources for the Community.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High-quality antibodies (Abs) are critical to neuroscience research, as they remain the primary affinity proteomics reagent used to label and capture endogenously expressed protein targets in the nervous system. As in other fields, neuroscientists are frequently confronted with inaccurate and irreproducible Ab-based results and/or reporting. The UC Davis/NIH NeuroMab Facility was created with the mission of addressing the unmet need for high-quality Abs in neuroscience research by applying a unique approach to generate and validate mouse monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) optimized for use against mammalian brain (i.e., NeuroMabs). Here we describe our methodology of multi-step mAb screening focused on identifying mAbs exhibiting efficacy and specificity in labeling mammalian brain samples. We provide examples from NeuroMab screens, and from the subsequent specialized validation of those selected as NeuroMabs. We highlight the particular challenges and considerations of determining specificity for brain immunolabeling. We also describe why our emphasis on extensive validation of large numbers of candidates by immunoblotting and immunohistochemistry against brain samples is essential for identifying those that exhibit efficacy and specificity in those applications to become NeuroMabs. We describe the special attention given to candidates with less common non-IgG1 IgG subclasses that can facilitate simultaneous multiplex labeling with subclass-specific secondary antibodies. We detail our recent use of recombinant cloning of NeuroMabs as a method to archive all NeuroMabs, to unambiguously define NeuroMabs at the DNA sequence level, and to re-engineer IgG1 NeuroMabs to less common IgG subclasses to facilitate their use in multiplex labeling. Finally, we provide suggestions to facilitate Ab development and use, as to design, execution and interpretation of Ab-based neuroscience experiments. Reproducibility in neuroscience research will improve with enhanced Ab validation, unambiguous identification of Abs used in published experiments, and end user proficiency in Ab-based assays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.