Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26644157›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2016

Open-Source Radiation Exposure Extraction Engine (RE3) with Patient-Specific Outlier Detection.

Samuel J Weisenthal, Les Folio, William Kovacs, Ari Seff, Vana Derderian, Ronald M Summers, Jianhua Yao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Samuel J WeisenthalNational Institutes of Health, Clinical Center, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Image Processing Service (CIPS), 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892-1182, USA.
Les FolioNational Institutes of Health, Clinical Center, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Image Processing Service (CIPS), 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892-1182, USA.
William KovacsNational Institutes of Health, Clinical Center, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Image Processing Service (CIPS), 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892-1182, USA.
Ari SeffNational Institutes of Health, Clinical Center, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Image Processing Service (CIPS), 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892-1182, USA.
Vana DerderianNational Institutes of Health, Clinical Center, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Image Processing Service (CIPS), 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892-1182, USA.
Ronald M SummersNational Institutes of Health, Clinical Center, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Image Processing Service (CIPS), 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892-1182, USA.
Jianhua YaoNational Institutes of Health, Clinical Center, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Image Processing Service (CIPS), 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892-1182, USA. jyao@cc.nih.gov.

Funding

Computer Aided Detection for Radiologic ImagesZIACL040004 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI SUMMERS, RONALD M. · 2009 to 2025
$0k
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present an open-source, picture archiving and communication system (PACS)-integrated radiation exposure extraction engine (RE3) that provides study-, series-, and slice-specific data for automated monitoring of computed tomography (CT) radiation exposure. RE3 was built using open-source components and seamlessly integrates with the PACS. RE3 calculations of dose length product (DLP) from the Digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) headers showed high agreement (R (2) = 0.99) with the vendor dose pages. For study-specific outlier detection, RE3 constructs robust, automatically updating multivariable regression models to predict DLP in the context of patient gender and age, scan length, water-equivalent diameter (D w), and scanned body volume (SBV). As proof of concept, the model was trained on 811 CT chest, abdomen + pelvis (CAP) exams and 29 outliers were detected. The continuous variables used in the outlier detection model were scan length (R (2)  = 0.45), D w (R (2) = 0.70), SBV (R (2) = 0.80), and age (R (2) = 0.01). The categorical variables were gender (male average 1182.7 ± 26.3 and female 1047.1 ± 26.9 mGy cm) and pediatric status (pediatric average 710.7 ± 73.6 mGy cm and adult 1134.5 ± 19.3 mGy cm).

Indexed as

Radiation DosageRadiology Information SystemsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAge FactorsChildFemaleHumansMalePelvisRadiation ExposureRadiography, AbdominalRadiography, ThoracicRegression AnalysisSex FactorsSoftwareAutomated measurementClinical workflowComputers in medicineData extractionData miningImaging informaticsMedical informatics applicationsOpen sourcePACS implementationPACS integrationQuality assuranceQuality controlRadiation doseSoftware designStatistical analysis

Identifiers

PMID26644157
PMCPMC4942384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.