Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26644132›Full record

Trial reportSubstance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy2015

Feasibility and initial efficacy of a culturally sensitive women-centered substance use intervention in Georgia: Sex risk outcomes.

Hendrée E Jones, Irma Kirtadze, David Otiashvili, Keryn Murphy, Kevin E O'Grady, William Zule, Evgeny Krupitsky, Wendee M Wechsberg

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01331460 (HIV and Drug Use in Georgian Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01331460 nacompletednot on this map

HIV and Drug Use in Georgian Women

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel HillRan2011 to 2016Enrolled128ConditionsHuman Immunodeficiency VirusArmsRBT, Case-Management
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hendrée E JonesUNC Horizons, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 127 Kingston Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27514, USA. Hendree_Jones@med.unc.edu.
Irma KirtadzeAddiction Research Center, Alternative Georgia, Tbilisi, 0177, Georgia. irma@altgeorgia.ge.
David OtiashviliAddiction Research Center, Alternative Georgia, Tbilisi, 0177, Georgia. dato@altgeorgia.ge.
Keryn MurphyUNC Horizons, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 127 Kingston Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27514, USA. kerynmurphy@gmail.com.
Kevin E O'GradyDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, MD, 20742, USA. ogrady@umd.edu.
William ZuleSubstance Abuse Treatment Evaluations and Interventions Research Program, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, ᅟ, NC, 27709, USA. zule@rti.org.
Evgeny KrupitskyDepartment of Addictions, Bekhterev Research Psychoneurological Institute, St. Petersburg, 192019, Russia. kruenator@gmail.com.
Wendee M WechsbergSubstance Abuse Treatment Evaluations and Interventions Research Program, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, ᅟ, NC, 27709, USA. wmw@rti.org.

Funding

HIV and Drug Use in Georgian WomenR01DA029880 · NIDA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI JONES, HENDREE E · 2010 to 2014
$2.0M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA029880
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis paper reports on the feasibility and initial efficacy of a culturally sensitive, comprehensive women-centered substance use intervention for women who inject drugs in Georgia in terms of the primary and secondary sex risk outcomes. The hypothesis under examination was that, relative to case management participants, participants in a culturally sensitive, comprehensive women-specific and -centered intervention would, on average, show significant decreases in past-30-day frequency of unprotected sex, unprotected sex at the last sexual encounter, and increases in condom use and safer sex actions.

methodsThe study was a two-arm randomized trial, in which 173 potentially eligible women were screened, and those 128 women determined to be eligible were assigned at random to either Reinforcement-based Treatment plus Women's Co-Op (RBT + WC) or case management (CM). RBT + WC participants received 12 sessions of a structured intervention with the goal of reducing risky sex and substance use and improving physical and mental health. CM participants received 12 sessions of case management and informational brochures that focused on the same issues on which RBT + WC focused. Participants were assessed at baseline, post-treatment, and 3 months following treatment enrollment.

resultsAnalyses revealed case management having significantly overall higher Safer Sex action scores than RBT + WC, and a significant decrease over time for past 30-day number of unprotected sex acts. Unprotected sex at the last encounter and Condom Use action scores were nonsignificant.

conclusionsWomen who inject drugs in Georgia are engaging in risky sexual practices, and are in need of an intervention that addresses these risky behaviors. Reasons for the failure to find differences between a culturally sensitive, comprehensive women-centered intervention and case management tailored to the needs of women who inject drugs in Georgia may have been the result of inadequate power to detect an effect in a sample whose drug use was not as serious as warranted by the intervention. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01331460 ).

Indexed as

Behavior TherapyAdultCase ManagementCondomsCulturally Competent CareFeasibility StudiesFemaleGeorgia (Republic)HumansSubstance Abuse, IntravenousSubstance-Related DisordersUnsafe SexYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26644132
PMCPMC4672492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.