ArticleHead and neck pathology2016
S-100 Negative Granular Cell Tumor of the Oral Cavity.
Article in Head and neck pathology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnosis and management of oesophageal granular cell tumour: A case report.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2025Article
- Oral granular cell tumor: a collaborative clinicopathological study of 61 cases.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2024Article
- Malignant granular cell tumour of floor of mouth (non-neural in origin) - A rare case report and review of literature.SAGE open medical case reports · 2024Article
- Granular cell tumor of the breast: A case report and review of literature.World journal of clinical cases · 2023Article
- Clinical and pathological analysis of congenital granular cell tumor.Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2022Article
- Investigation of the Molecular Profile of Granular Cell Tumours and Schwannomas of the Oral Cavity.Dentistry journal · 2022Article
- Rare case of granular cell tumor of perianal region: a case report and literature review.The Journal of international medical research · 2021Review
- Congenital Granular Cell Epulis: Classic Presentation and Its Differential Diagnosis.Head and neck pathology · 2020Article
- A Guide to Yellow Oral Mucosal Entities: Etiology and Pathology.Head and neck pathology · 2019Review
- S-100 Negative Granular Cell Tumor (So-called Primitive Polypoid Non-neural Granular Cell Tumor) of the Oral Cavity.Head and neck pathology · 2017Article
- S100 negative granular cell tumor of the oral cavity: dermoscopy and surgical approach.Anais brasileiros de dermatologiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Classic granular cell tumor is a mesenchymal neoplasm that commonly occurs on the skin, but is not infrequently found in the oral cavity, primarily on the dorsal tongue. Diagnosis is usually straightforward with hematoxylin and eosin stained slides. Immunohistochemical studies on classic granular cell tumor shows positive immunostaining for S-100 and vimentin, while CD68 is variably positive. We report a case of otherwise unremarkable oral granular cell tumor that was immunohistochemically negative for S-100, and positive for vimentin and CD68, and discuss the differential diagnosis. The results of the immunohistochemical studies in our case are compared with those of classic S-100 positive oral granular cell tumors, as well as cutaneous and oral S-100 negative granular cell tumors. Classic S-100 positive granular cell tumors and S-100 negative granular cell tumors of the oral cavity can only be distinguished by immunohistochemical studies; however, the necessity of this distinction is unclear, as both are benign lesions in which recurrence is unlikely.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.