Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26643904›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2015

A method for positive forensic identification of samples from extremely low-coverage sequence data.

Samuel H Vohr, Carlos Fernando Buen Abad Najar, Beth Shapiro, Richard E Green

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. On forensic likelihood ratios from low-coverage sequencing.Forensic science international. Genetics · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Haplotype-aware inference of human chromosome abnormalities.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Linkage disequilibrium matches forensic genetic records to disjoint genomic marker sets.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Samuel H VohrDepartment of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, 1156 High St, Santa Cruz, CA, 95064, USA. svohr@ucsc.edu.
Carlos Fernando Buen Abad NajarFacultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Av. Universidad 3000 Circuito Exterior S/N, Delegación Coyoacán, Ciudad Universitaria, C.P. 04510, Ciudad de México, D.F., México. fernandobuenabad@ciencias.unam.mx.
Beth ShapiroDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, 1156 High St, Santa Cruz, CA, 95064, USA. bashapir@ucsc.edu.
Richard E GreenDepartment of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, 1156 High St, Santa Cruz, CA, 95064, USA. ed@soe.ucsc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDetermining whether two DNA samples originate from the same individual is difficult when the amount of retrievable DNA is limited. This is often the case for ancient, historic, and forensic samples. The most widely used approaches rely on amplification of a defined panel of multi-allelic markers and comparison to similar data from other samples. When the amount retrievable DNA is low these approaches fail.

resultsWe describe a new method for assessing whether shotgun DNA sequence data from two samples are consistent with originating from the same or different individuals. Our approach makes use of the large catalogs of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers to maximize the chances of observing potentially discriminating alleles. We further reduce the amount of data required by taking advantage of patterns of linkage disequilibrium modeled by a reference panel of haplotypes to indirectly compare observations at pairs of linked SNPs. Using both coalescent simulations and real sequencing data from modern and ancient sources, we show that this approach is robust with respect to the reference panel and has power to detect positive identity from DNA libraries with less than 1 % random and non-overlapping genome coverage in each sample.

conclusionWe present a powerful new approach that can determine whether DNA from two samples originated from the same individual even when only minute quantities of DNA are recoverable from each.

Indexed as

Molecular Diagnostic TechniquesAllelesComputer SimulationForensic GeneticsGenetic LociGenomic LibraryHumansLinkage DisequilibriumPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID26643904
PMCPMC4672566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.