Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26643710›Full record

ArticleBMC ophthalmology2015

A comparative study of glaucoma referrals in Southeast Scotland: effect of the new general ophthalmic service contract, Eyecare integration pilot programme and NICE guidelines.

Karim El-Assal, Jonathan Foulds, Stuart Dobson, Roshini Sanders

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The effectiveness of interventions for optometric referrals into the hospital eye service: A review.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Karim El-AssalDepartment of Ophthalmology, Queen Margaret Hospital, Whitefield Road, KY12 0SU, Dunfermline, Fife, UK. karim.el-assal@nhs.net.
Jonathan FouldsDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, UK.
Stuart DobsonMedical Informatics, Queen Margaret Hospital, Dunfermline, Fife, UK.
Roshini SandersDepartment of Ophthalmology, Queen Margaret Hospital, Whitefield Road, KY12 0SU, Dunfermline, Fife, UK.
Queen Margaret Hospital · GBNinewells Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlaucoma is a progressive disease responsible for the second commonest cause of blindness in the UK. Identifying appropriate patients for hospital care remains an ongoing challenge for all UK hospital glaucoma services. The purpose of our study is to evaluate accuracy and outcome of community optometry referrals before and after implementation of the new general ophthalmic service contract in 2006, the Eyecare Integration Programme pilot in 2008 and the effect of NICE guidelines in glaucoma in 2009, over a 12-year period

methodsA retrospective case analysis using a glaucoma electronic patient record was performed encompassing two six-year periods, 2000-2006 (Group A), and 2007-2012 (Group B).

resultsOne thousand six hundred twenty-two new patients' records were analysed. Waiting times reduced from 12.3 to 9.4 weeks. Significantly more patients kept first appointment (p = 0.0002) in group B. Glaucoma symptoms were significantly more in group A (p <0.0001) and only three patients lost Snellen' visual acuity before appointment in group B compared to 12 in group A. Documentation of intraocular pressure was made in 74.1% of Group A and 75.9% of Group B, optic disc appearance in 85.4% of Group A, and 93% of Group B and visual fields in 84.4% of Group A and 81.3% of Group B. Significantly less normal (p < 0,0001), more glaucoma suspects (p < 0.0001), more open angle glaucoma (p = 0.0006) and fewer other conditions (p = 0.0024) were present in group B, compared to group A.

conclusionPatients were referred earlier with shorter waiting times for hospital appointments with the new Scottish general ophthalmic service and Eyecare Integration Programme. Additionally there were fewer false positive referrals with more diagnosis of glaucomatous disease. We discuss the benefits of these national screening and referral pathways together with their limitations and further refinements.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overContractsDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedDocumentationFemaleGlaucomaGuideline AdherenceHospital DepartmentsHumansIntraocular PressureMaleMiddle AgedNational Health ProgramsOphthalmology

Identifiers

PMID26643710
PMCPMC4672504
OpenAlexW2195172951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.