ArticleEndoscopic ultrasound
The safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic cystic lesions.
Article in Endoscopic ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in assessment of detailed structures of pancreatic cystic neoplasms.World journal of gastroenterology · 2017Trial
- Effects of premedication with Pronase for endoscopic ultrasound of the stomach: A randomized controlled trial.World journal of gastroenterology · 2016Trial
- Seeding of a Tumor in the Gastric Wall after Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Aspiration of Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm of the Pancreas.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2020Article
- Stratifying Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms by Cyst Fluid Analysis: Present and Future.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Current indications and yield of endoscopic ultrasound and ancillary techniques in pancreatic cystic neoplasms.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2019Review
- Endoscopic ultrasound-guided through-the-needle microforceps biopsy in the evaluation of pancreatic cystic lesions: a multicenter study.Endoscopy international open · 2018Article
- Management of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms: Controversies in Guidelines and Future Perspectives.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2018Review
- Diagnosis and Management of Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2017Review
- Incidents and adverse events of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic cystic lesions.World journal of gastroenterology · 2017Article
- Serous pancreatic neoplasia, data and review.World journal of gastroenterology · 2017Review
- Can endoscopic ultrasound-guided needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy replace fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic and mediastinal diseases?Endoscopic ultrasoundReview
- Role of endoscopic ultrasound for pancreatic cystic lesions: Past, present, and future!Endoscopic ultrasoundArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is widely used in the evaluation of various pancreatic diseases including pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs). EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of PCLs provides cyst fluid, which is used for the differentiation of PCLs. EUS-FNA of PCLs is a safe procedure with a low complication rate. Contrary to the concerns expressed by some investigators, preoperative EUS-FNA of mucinous PCLs is unlikely to increase the frequency of postoperative peritoneal seeding.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.