Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26643573›Full record

ArticleMolecular oncology2016

Targeted capture massively parallel sequencing analysis of LCIS and invasive lobular cancer: Repertoire of somatic genetic alterations and clonal relationships.

Rita A Sakr, Michail Schizas, Jose V Scarpa Carniello, Charlotte K Y Ng, Salvatore Piscuoglio, Dilip Giri, Victor P Andrade, Marina De Brot, Raymond S Lim, Russell Towers and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. An update on intraductal and intralobular proliferative lesions of the breast.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Lobular carcinoma in situ: diagnostic criteria and molecular correlates.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2021
    Review
  9. Genomic profiling of pleomorphic and florid lobular carcinoma in situ reveals highly recurrent ERBB2 and ERRB3 alterations.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Lobular CarcinomasClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2019
    Article
  14. Lobular Carcinoma In Situ.Surgical pathology clinics · 2018
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Leveraging premalignant biology for immune-based cancer prevention.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rita A SakrBreast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Michail SchizasBreast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Jose V Scarpa CarnielloBreast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Charlotte K Y NgDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Salvatore PiscuoglioDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Dilip GiriDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Victor P AndradeBreast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Marina De BrotBreast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Raymond S LimDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Russell TowersBreast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Britta WeigeltDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Jorge S Reis-FilhoDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States; Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States. Electronic address: reisfilj@mskcc.org.
Tari A KingBreast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States. Electronic address: tking7@partners.org.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) has been proposed as a non-obligate precursor of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). Here we sought to define the repertoire of somatic genetic alterations in pure LCIS and in synchronous LCIS and ILC using targeted massively parallel sequencing.

methodsDNA samples extracted from microdissected LCIS, ILC and matched normal breast tissue or peripheral blood from 30 patients were subjected to massively parallel sequencing targeting all exons of 273 genes, including the genes most frequently mutated in breast cancer and DNA repair-related genes. Single nucleotide variants and insertions and deletions were identified using state-of-the-art bioinformatics approaches.

resultsThe constellation of somatic mutations found in LCIS (n = 34) and ILC (n = 21) were similar, with the most frequently mutated genes being CDH1 (56% and 66%, respectively), PIK3CA (41% and 52%, respectively) and CBFB (12% and 19%, respectively). Among 19 LCIS and ILC synchronous pairs, 14 (74%) had at least one identical mutation in common, including identical PIK3CA and CDH1 mutations. Paired analysis of independent foci of LCIS from 3 breasts revealed at least one common mutation in each of the 3 pairs (CDH1, PIK3CA, CBFB and PKHD1L1).

conclusionLCIS and ILC have a similar repertoire of somatic mutations, with PIK3CA and CDH1 being the most frequently mutated genes. The presence of identical mutations between LCIS-LCIS and LCIS-ILC pairs demonstrates that LCIS is a clonal neoplastic lesion, and provides additional evidence that at least some LCIS are non-obligate precursors of ILC.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingAntigens, CDBreast NeoplasmsCadherinsCarcinoma in SituCarcinoma, LobularClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesCohort StudiesCore Binding Factor beta SubunitExonsFemaleHumansMutationNeoplasm InvasivenessPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesReceptors, Cell SurfaceAntigens, CDCadherinsCBFB protein, humanCDH1 protein, humanClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesCore Binding Factor beta SubunitPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPIK3CA protein, humanPKHD1L1 protein, humanReceptors, Cell SurfaceClonalityInvasive lobular carcinomaLobular carcinoma in situMassively parallel sequencingSomatic genetic alterations

Identifiers

PMID26643573
PMCPMC4989916
OpenAlexW2175842422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.