Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26643459›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2015

Fundamental concerns of women living with HIV around the implementation of Option B+.

Rebecca Matheson, Suzette Moses-Burton, Amy C Hsieh, Sophie Dilmitis, Margaret Happy, Eunice Sinyemu, Sophie O Brion, Aditi Sharma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Sexual and reproductive health and human rights of women living with HIV.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 5 countries.

Rebecca MathesonInternational Community of Women Living with HIV (ICW), Nairobi, Kenya.
Suzette Moses-BurtonGlobal Network of People Living with HIV (GNP+), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amy C HsiehGlobal Network of People Living with HIV (GNP+), Brooklyn, NY, USA; amyhsiehesq@gmail.com.
Sophie DilmitisInternational Community of Women Living with HIV (ICW), Harare, Zimbabwe.
Margaret HappyInternational Community of Women Living with HIV (ICW), Kampala, Uganda.
Eunice SinyemuInternational Community of Women Living with HIV (ICW), Lusaka, Zambia.
Sophie O BrionInternational Community of Women Living with HIV (ICW), Washington, DC, USA.
Aditi SharmaGlobal Network of People Living with HIV (GNP+), Brighton, UK.
Zero to Three · USInternational Community of Women Living with HIV · UGNational HIV/AIDS/STI/TB Council · ZM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn 2011, the Global Plan towards the Elimination of New HIV Infections among Children by 2015 and Keeping Their Mothers Alive was launched to scale up efforts to comprehensively end vertical HIV transmission and support mothers living with HIV in remaining healthy. Amidst excitement around using treatment as prevention, Malawi's Ministry of Health conceived Option B+, a strategy used to prevent vertical transmission by initiating all pregnant and breastfeeding women living with HIV on lifelong antiretroviral therapy, irrespective of CD4 count. In 2013, for programmatic and operational reasons, the WHO officially recommended Option B+ to countries with generalized epidemics, limited access to CD4 testing, limited partner testing, long breastfeeding duration or high fertility rates. DISCUSSION: While acknowledging the opportunity to increase treatment access globally and its potential, this commentary reviews the concerns of women living with HIV about human rights, community-based support and other barriers to service uptake and retention in the Option B+ context. Option B+ intensifies many of the pre-existing challenges of HIV prevention and treatment programmes. As women seek comprehensive services to prevent vertical transmission, they can experience various human rights violations, including lack of informed consent, involuntary or coercive HIV testing, limited treatment options, termination of pregnancy or coerced sterilization and pressure to start treatment. Yet, peer and community support strategies can promote treatment readiness, uptake, adherence and lifelong retention in care; reduce stigma and discrimination; and mitigate potential violence stemming from HIV disclosure. Ensuring available and accessible quality care, offering food support and improving linkages to care could increase service uptake and retention. With the heightened focus on interventions to reach pregnant and breastfeeding women living with HIV, a parallel increase in vigilance to secure their health and rights is critical.

conclusionThe authors conclude that real progress towards reducing vertical transmission and achieving viral load suppression can only be made by upholding the human rights of women living with HIV, investing in community-based responses, and ensuring universal access to quality healthcare. Only then will the opportunity of accessing lifelong treatment result in improving the health, dignity and lives of women living with HIV, their children and families.

Indexed as

AdultCD4 Lymphocyte CountCoercionFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalMalawiPregnancyResidence CharacteristicsViolenceWomen's RightsadherenceeMTCTimplementation sciencePMTCTqualitative researchretentionvertical transmission

Identifiers

PMID26643459
PMCPMC4672458
OpenAlexW2189062934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.