Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26643413›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational science2015

Research START: A Multimethod Study of Barriers and Accelerators of Recruiting Research Participants.

Mark A Stein, Michele Shaffer, Abigail Echo-Hawk, Jody Smith, Ann Stapleton, Ann Melvin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Uncovering key clinical trial features influencing recruitment.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Two-step recruitment process optimizes retention in FLEX clinical trial.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mark A SteinSeattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Michele ShafferSeattle Children's Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Abigail Echo-HawkInstitute of Translational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Institute of Translational Health Sciences, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Jody SmithInstitute of Translational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Institute of Translational Health Sciences, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Ann StapletonInstitute of Translational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Institute of Translational Health Sciences, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Ann MelvinSeattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Funding

Institute of Translational Health SciencesUL1TR000423 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DISIS, MARY L. · 2012 to 2016
$49.4M
Sequencing Treatments for Mothers with ADHD & Their At-Risk Children: A SMART pilR34MH099208 · NIMH · SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI CHRONIS-TUSCANO, ANDREA, STEIN, MARK A · 2013 to 2015
$694k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000423NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH099208
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Under-recruitment into clinical trials is a common and costly problem that undermines medical research. To better understand barriers to recruitment into clinical trials in our region, we conducted a multimethod descriptive study. We initially surveyed investigators who had conducted or were currently conducting studies that utilized an adult or pediatric clinical research center (n = 92). We then conducted focus groups and key informant interviews with investigators, coordinators, and other stakeholders in clinical and translational research (n = 32 individuals). Only 41% of respondents reported that they had or were successfully meeting recruitment goals and 24% of the closed studies actually met their targeted recruitment goals. Varied reasons were identified for poor recruitment but there was not a single investigator or study "phenotype" that predicted enrollment outcome. Investigators commonly recruited from their own practice or clinic, and 29% used a manual electronic medical record search. The majority of investigators would utilize a service that provides recruitment advice, including feasibility assessment and consultation, easier access to the electronic health record and assistance with institutional review board and other regulatory requirements. Our findings suggest potential benefits providing assistance across a range of services that can be individualized to the varied needs of clinical and translational investigators.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicPatient SelectionAccess to InformationAdultChildData CollectionData Interpretation, StatisticalDrugs, InvestigationalElectronic Health RecordsFocus GroupsHumansPediatricsProgram DevelopmentResearch DesignTranslational Research, BiomedicalDrugs, Investigationalparticipant recruitmentregistriesregulatory science

Identifiers

PMID26643413
PMCPMC4753776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.