Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26643337›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2016

Towards Rational Dosing Algorithms for Vancomycin in Neonates and Infants Based on Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling.

Esther J H Janssen, Pyry A J Välitalo, Karel Allegaert, Roosmarijn F W de Cock, Sinno H P Simons, Catherine M T Sherwin, Johan W Mouton, Johannes N van den Anker, Catherijne A J Knibbe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Use of Antibiotics in Preterm Newborns.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Neonatal sepsis: within and beyond China.Chinese medical journal · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Esther J H JanssenDivision of Pharmacology, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Pyry A J VälitaloDivision of Pharmacology, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Karel AllegaertNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Roosmarijn F W de CockDivision of Pharmacology, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Sinno H P SimonsDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Catherine M T SherwinDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Johan W MoutonDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6736-4149
Johannes N van den AnkerDivision of Pediatric Clinical Pharmacology, Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA Department of Paediatric Pharmacology, University Children's Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland Intensive Care and Department of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Catherijne A J KnibbeDivision of Pharmacology, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands Department of Clinical Pharmacy, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands c.knibbe@antoniusziekenhuis.nl.

Funding

LCenter for Clinical and Translational Science and TrainingUL1TR001425 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI MEINZEN-DERR, JAREEN, STRAWN, JEFFREY ROBERT · 2015 to 2024
$37.5M
Preclinical dosing optimization: Dosing schedule, tissueU54HD071601 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI VAN DEN ANKER, JOHN NICOLAAS · 2011 to 2015
$4.0M
Optimizing the Use of Morphine in Preterm InfantsR01HD048689 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER · PI VAN DEN ANKER, JOHANNES NICOLAAS · 2005 to 2009
$1.5M
Optimizing the Use of Methadone in Newborn InfantsK24DA027992 · NIDA · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI VAN DEN ANKER, JOHANNES NICOLAAS · 2010 to 2014
$878k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001425NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD048689NICHD NIH HHS R01HD048689NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD071601NICHD NIH HHS U54HD071601NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA027992NIDA NIH HHS K24DA027992
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because of the recent awareness that vancomycin doses should aim to meet a target area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) instead of trough concentrations, more aggressive dosing regimens are warranted also in the pediatric population. In this study, both neonatal and pediatric pharmacokinetic models for vancomycin were externally evaluated and subsequently used to derive model-based dosing algorithms for neonates, infants, and children. For the external validation, predictions from previously published pharmacokinetic models were compared to new data. Simulations were performed in order to evaluate current dosing regimens and to propose a model-based dosing algorithm. The AUC/MIC over 24 h (AUC24/MIC) was evaluated for all investigated dosing schedules (target of >400), without any concentration exceeding 40 mg/liter. Both the neonatal and pediatric models of vancomycin performed well in the external data sets, resulting in concentrations that were predicted correctly and without bias. For neonates, a dosing algorithm based on body weight at birth and postnatal age is proposed, with daily doses divided over three to four doses. For infants aged <1 year, doses between 32 and 60 mg/kg/day over four doses are proposed, while above 1 year of age, 60 mg/kg/day seems appropriate. As the time to reach steady-state concentrations varies from 155 h in preterm infants to 36 h in children aged >1 year, an initial loading dose is proposed. Based on the externally validated neonatal and pediatric vancomycin models, novel dosing algorithms are proposed for neonates and children aged <1 year. For children aged 1 year and older, the currently advised maintenance dose of 60 mg/kg/day seems appropriate.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArea Under CurveComputer SimulationHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMicrobial Sensitivity TestsModels, TheoreticalReproducibility of ResultsVancomycinVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID26643337
PMCPMC4750654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.