Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26643277›Full record

ArticleBehavior modification2016

Depression and Rural Environment are Associated With Poor Oral Health Among Pregnant Women in Northern Appalachia.

Daniel W McNeil, Sarah E Hayes, Cameron L Randall, Deborah E Polk, Kathy Neiswanger, John R Shaffer, Robert J Weyant, Betsy Foxman, Elizabeth Kao, Richard J Crout and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior modification, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel W McNeilWest Virginia University, Morgantown, USA Center for Oral Health Research in Appalachia dmcneil@wvu.edu.
Sarah E HayesWest Virginia University, Morgantown, USA Center for Oral Health Research in Appalachia.
Cameron L RandallWest Virginia University, Morgantown, USA Center for Oral Health Research in Appalachia.
Deborah E PolkCenter for Oral Health Research in Appalachia University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Kathy NeiswangerCenter for Oral Health Research in Appalachia University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
John R ShafferCenter for Oral Health Research in Appalachia University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Robert J WeyantCenter for Oral Health Research in Appalachia University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Betsy FoxmanCenter for Oral Health Research in Appalachia University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Elizabeth KaoWest Virginia University, Morgantown, USA Center for Oral Health Research in Appalachia.
Richard J CroutWest Virginia University, Morgantown, USA Center for Oral Health Research in Appalachia.
Stella ChapmanWest Virginia University, Morgantown, USA Center for Oral Health Research in Appalachia.
Linda J BrownWest Virginia University, Morgantown, USA Center for Oral Health Research in Appalachia.
Jennifer L MaurerCenter for Oral Health Research in Appalachia University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Mary L MarazitaCenter for Oral Health Research in Appalachia University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
West Virginia University · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Psychosocial Influences on Rural Children's Oral HealthR01DE014899 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI FOXMAN, BETSY, MARAZITA, MARY L. · 2002 to 2020
$39.9M
Provider-Patient-Caregiver Interactions in Pediatric DentistryR21DE026540 · NIDCR · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI MCNEIL, CHERYL BODIFORD, MCNEIL, DANIEL W · 2017 to 2018
$550k
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE014899NIDCR NIH HHS R21 DE026540
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both oral health problems and depression among pregnant women contribute to maternal-infant health outcomes. Little is known, however, about the potential effects of clinically significant depression on the oral health status of pregnant women. The purpose of the present study was to determine the influence of clinically significant depression and rural- or urban-dwelling status on oral health outcomes among pregnant women. Pregnant women (N = 685) in rural (i.e., West Virginia) and urban (i.e., Pittsburgh, PA) areas of northern Appalachia were assessed by calibrated examiners regarding gingivitis, oral hygiene, and DMFT (decayed, missing, and filled teeth), completed the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D) and provided demographics. Participants were categorized based on clinically significant depressive symptoms (CES-D ≥ 16) and rural/urban domicile. Women with depression and those living in rural areas had worse oral health on all three indices than their non-depressed and urban counterparts. Depression, particularly among women in rural areas, affects certain oral health indices and represents a modifiable target for intervention. Moreover, treatments designed specifically for rural populations may be of particular utility. Women who are pregnant or planning to become pregnant may benefit from regular depression screenings from their dental and medical health care providers.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAppalachian RegionDepressionDepressive DisorderFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHumansOral HealthPregnancyQuality of LifeRural PopulationUrban PopulationAppalachiadepressionhealth disparitiesoral healthpregnancyrural

Identifiers

PMID26643277
PMCPMC4893820
OpenAlexW2297545578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.