Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26643072›Full record

Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2016

A web-based intervention (RESTORE) to support self-management of cancer-related fatigue following primary cancer treatment: a multi-centre proof of concept randomised controlled trial.

Claire Foster, Chloe Grimmett, Christine M May, Sean Ewings, Michelle Myall, Claire Hulme, Peter W Smith, Cassandra Powers, Lynn Calman, Jo Armes and 12 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Nurse-led telehealth interventions for symptom management in patients with cancer receiving systemic or radiation therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Self-management interventions for cancer survivors: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2018
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Co-designing a web-based intervention (RESTORE) to support self-management of cancer-related fatigue in people living with a brain tumour.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Living With and Beyond Cancer With Comorbid Conditions: Qualitative Insights to Understand Psychosocial Support Needs.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Assessment of the psychometric properties of the traditional Chinese version of the cancer survivors' self-efficacy scale.Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Claire FosterMacmillan Survivorship Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK. C.L.Foster@soton.ac.uk.
Chloe GrimmettMacmillan Survivorship Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Christine M MayMacmillan Survivorship Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Sean EwingsSouthampton Statistical Research Institute, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Michelle MyallMacmillan Survivorship Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Claire HulmeAcademic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9LJ, UK.
Peter W SmithSouthampton Statistical Research Institute, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Cassandra PowersMacmillan Survivorship Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Lynn CalmanMacmillan Survivorship Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Jo ArmesFlorence Nightingale School of Nursing & Midwifery, King's College, London, SE1 8WA, UK.
Matthew BreckonsInstitute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK.
Jessica CornerFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Deborah FenlonFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Lynn BatehupFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Elaine LennanUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
Carl R MayFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Carolyn MorrisResearch Partner, London, UK.
Amanda NeylonMacmillan Cancer Support, London, SE1 7UQ, UK.
Emma ReamFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7JP, UK.
Lesley TurnerResearch Partner, London, UK.
Lucy YardleyPsychology, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Alison RichardsonFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L01629X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCancer-related fatigue (CRF) is a frequent and distressing symptom experienced after cancer treatment. RESTORE is the first web-based resource designed to enhance self-efficacy to manage CRF following curative-intent treatment. The aim of this study is to test the proof of concept and inform the design of an effectiveness trial.

methodsA multi-centre parallel-group two-armed (1:1) exploratory randomised controlled trial (RCT) with qualitative process evaluation was employed in the study. Participants (≥18 years; ≤5 years post treatment with moderate to severe fatigue) were recruited and randomly assigned to RESTORE or a leaflet. Feasibility and acceptability were measured by recruitment, attrition, intervention adherence, completion of outcome measures and process evaluation. Change in self-efficacy to manage CRF was also explored. Outcome measures were completed at baseline (T0), 6 weeks (T1) and 12 weeks (T2). Data were analysed using mixed-effects linear regression and directed content analysis.

resultsOne hundred and sixty-three people participated in the trial and 19 in the process evaluation. The intervention was feasible (39 % of eligible patients consented) and acceptable (attrition rate 36 %). There was evidence of higher fatigue self-efficacy at T1 in the intervention group vs comparator (mean difference 0.51 [-0.08 to 1.11]), though the difference in groups decreased by 12 weeks. Time since diagnosis influenced perceived usefulness of the intervention. Modifications were suggested.

conclusionProof of concept was achieved. The RESTORE intervention should be subject to a definitive trial with some adjustments. Provision of an effective supportive resource would empower cancer survivors to manage CRF after treatment completion.

trial registrationISRCTN67521059.

Indexed as

AdultAgedFatigueFemaleHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPerceptionSelf CareSelf EfficacySurvivorsCancerFatigueInterventionSelf-managementWeb-based

Identifiers

PMID26643072
PMCPMC4846690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.