Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26642877›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2015

Consecutive magnetic resonance imaging during brachytherapy for cervical carcinoma: predictive value of volume measurements with respect to persistent disease and prognosis.

J E Mongula, B F M Slangen, D M J Lambregts, F Cellini, F C H Bakers, L C H W Lutgens, T Van Gorp, A J Kruse, R F P M Kruitwagen, R G H Beets-Tan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

J E MongulaDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Postbus 5800, 6202, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands. jordymongula@hotmail.com.
B F M SlangenDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Postbus 5800, 6202, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands. brigitte.slangen@mumc.nl.
D M J LambregtsDepartment of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands. d.lambregts@mumc.nl.
F CelliniMAASTRO clinic, Postbus 3035, 6202, NA, Maastricht, The Netherlands. f.cellinimd@gmail.com.
F C H BakersDepartment of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands. fch.bakers@mumc.nl.
L C H W LutgensGROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, The Netherlands. ludy.lutgens@maastro.nl.
T Van GorpDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Postbus 5800, 6202, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands. toon.van.gorp@mumc.nl.
A J KruseDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Postbus 5800, 6202, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands. arnold.kruse@mumc.nl.
R F P M KruitwagenDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Postbus 5800, 6202, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands. r.kruitwagen@mumc.nl.
R G H Beets-TanGROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, The Netherlands. beetstan@me.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCervical cancer is associated with a high yearly mortality. The presence of persistent disease after radiotherapy is a significant predictor of patient survival. The aim of our study was to assess if tumor volume regression measured with MR imaging at the time of brachytherapy can discriminate between patients who eventually will achieve a complete response to radiotherapy from those who will not. The second objective was to evaluate whether tumor volume regression predicts overall treatment failure.

methodsMRI was evaluated quantitatively in 35 patients; by means of tumor volumetry on T2-weighted MR images before treatment, at the first BCT application, and at the final BCT. The MR images were independently analyzed by two investigators. As a reference standard histopathologic confirmation of residual tumor and/or clinical exam during follow-up > 1 year were used. Area under the curve were compared, P-values <0.05 were considered significant.

resultsThere was a good correlation between volume measurements made by the two observers. A residual tumor volume >9.4 cm(3) at final BCT and tumor volume regression < 77 % of the pre-treatment volume were significantly associated with local residual tumor after completion of therapy (p < 0.02) (AUC, 0.98-1.00). A volume >2.8 cm(3) at final BCT was associated with overall treatment failure (p < 0.03).

conclusionOur study shows that volume analysis during BCT is a predictive tool for local tumor response and overall treatment outcome. The potential of local response assessment to identify patients at high risk of overall treatment failure is promising.

Indexed as

AdultAgedArea Under CurveBrachytherapyFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesROC CurveTreatment OutcomeTumor BurdenUterine Cervical Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID26642877
PMCPMC4672558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.