ArticlePLoS computational biology2015
MiR-192-Mediated Positive Feedback Loop Controls the Robustness of Stress-Induced p53 Oscillations in Breast Cancer Cells.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Translating Nature's Design Rules: How Catalysis and Life Science Guide Molecular Catassembly.JACS Au · 2026Review
- A p53-responsive microRNA-100 released from cardiomyoblasts serves as an early biomarker for acute coronary syndrome.Human cell · 2026Article
- Tumor Suppressor p53 and MicroRNAs Interaction in Breast Cancer.Oncology research · 2026Review
- Identification and validation of bile exosomal microRNA signatures for diagnosing acute rejection in liver transplant recipients.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- Article
- Review
- microRNA-Mediated Encoding and Decoding of Time-Dependent Signals in Tumorigenesis.Biomolecules · 2022Review
- Uncoupling gene expression noise along the central dogma using genome engineered human cell lines.Nucleic acids research · 2020Article
- Effects of Mycoplasmas on the Host Cell Signaling Pathways.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Dynamic Behavior of p53 Driven by Delay and a Microrna-34a-Mediated Feedback Loop.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Review
- Mathematical Modeling of p53 Pathways.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- Coordination of miR-192 and miR-22 in p53-Mediated Cell Fate Decision.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- Integrated Regulation of HuR by Translation Repression and Protein Degradation Determines Pulsatile Expression of p53 Under DNA Damage.iScience · 2019Article
- Mechanistic Computational Models of MicroRNA-Mediated Signaling Networks in Human Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- XPD suppresses cell proliferation and migration via miR-29a-3p-Mdm2/PDGF-B axis in HCC.Cell & bioscience · 2019Article
- miR-192 Is Overexpressed and Promotes Cell Proliferation in Prostate Cancer.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2019Article
- Mapping the operational landscape of microRNAs in synthetic gene circuits.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2018Article
- Article
- A dynamical framework for complex fractional killing.Scientific reports · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The p53 tumor suppressor protein plays a critical role in cellular stress and cancer prevention. A number of post-transcriptional regulators, termed microRNAs, are closely connected with the p53-mediated cellular networks. While the molecular interactions among p53 and microRNAs have emerged, a systems-level understanding of the regulatory mechanism and the role of microRNAs-forming feedback loops with the p53 core remains elusive. Here we have identified from literature that there exist three classes of microRNA-mediated feedback loops revolving around p53, all with the nature of positive feedback coincidentally. To explore the relationship between the cellular performance of p53 with the microRNA feedback pathways, we developed a mathematical model of the core p53-MDM2 module coupled with three microRNA-mediated positive feedback loops involving miR-192, miR-34a, and miR-29a. Simulations and bifurcation analysis in relationship to extrinsic noise reproduce the oscillatory behavior of p53 under DNA damage in single cells, and notably show that specific microRNA abrogation can disrupt the wild-type cellular phenotype when the ubiquitous cell-to-cell variability is taken into account. To assess these in silico results we conducted microRNA-perturbation experiments in MCF7 breast cancer cells. Time-lapse microscopy of cell-population behavior in response to DNA double-strand breaks, together with image classification of single-cell phenotypes across a population, confirmed that the cellular p53 oscillations are compromised after miR-192 perturbations, matching well with the model predictions. Our study via modeling in combination with quantitative experiments provides new evidence on the role of microRNA-mediated positive feedback loops in conferring robustness to the system performance of stress-induced response of p53.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.