ReviewCurrent opinion in neurology2016
Pre and intrahospital workflow for acute stroke treatment.
Review in Current opinion in neurology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prehospital Prediction of Large Vessel Occlusion in Suspected Stroke Patients.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2018Pooled it
- Streamlining Acute Stroke Processes and Data Collection: A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Prehospital time of suspected stroke patients treated by emergency medical service: a nationwide study in Thailand.International journal of emergency medicine · 2021Article
- Potential accuracy of prehospital NIHSS-based triage for selection of candidates for acute endovascular stroke therapy.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2021Article
- Predictors of Acute Neurological Worsening after Endovascular Thrombectomy.Interventional neurology · 2020Article
- Update in the Early Management and Reperfusion Strategies of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke.Critical care research and practice · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewWith the recent demonstration of the effectiveness of rapid recanalization of large vessel occlusions in acute ischemic stroke, it is important to assess the current status of pre and intrahospital workflow for acute stroke. RECENT
findingsWe will review trends in the evaluation and treatment of acute stroke and offer suggestions for how best to advance the workflow for acute stroke care in the coming years. SUMMARY: Future research is needed for: field use of clinical scores for predicting large vessel occlusions, telemedicine to facilitate prehospital triage, and pre and intrahospital processes for optimizing stroke care delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.