ArticlePloS one2015
Surface Modification of Biodegradable Polymers towards Better Biocompatibility and Lower Thrombogenicity.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Performance characterization and biocompatibility assessment of silicone polyurethanes for polymer heart valve applications.RSC advances · 2024Article
- Physicochemical Properties of UV-Irradiated, Biaxially Oriented PLA Tubular Scaffolds.Polymers · 2023Article
- PreclinicalFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Colorimetric and fluorometric reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) assay for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2.Functional & integrative genomics · 2022Article
- Accelerated Endothelialization of Nanofibrous Scaffolds for Biomimetic Cardiovascular Implants.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The Development of Design and Manufacture Techniques for Bioresorbable Coronary Artery Stents.Micromachines · 2021Review
- Strategies for Enhancing Polyester-Based Materials for Bone Fixation Applications.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Dialysis-Induced Cardiovascular and Multiorgan Morbidity.Kidney international reports · 2020Review
- Osteoblasts migration, attachment and human bone marrow-mesenchymal stem cells osteogenic differentiation towards surface engineered and growth factors conjugated poly(lactic acid) microspheres.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2020Article
- Characterization of Photoluminescent Polylactone-Based Nanoparticles for Their Applications in Cardiovascular Diseases.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019Article
- Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds in Interventional Neuroradiology.Clinical neuroradiology · 2018Article
- Novel approach for a PTX/VEGF dual drug delivery system in cardiovascular applications-an innovative bulk and surface drug immobilization.Drug delivery and translational research · 2018Article
- Emerging Technologies in Flow Diverters and Stents for Cerebrovascular Diseases.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDrug-eluting stents (DES) based on permanent polymeric coating matrices have been introduced to overcome the in stent restenosis associated with bare metal stents (BMS). A further step was the development of DES with biodegradable polymeric coatings to address the risk of thrombosis associated with first-generation DES. In this study we evaluate the biocompatibility of biodegradable polymer materials for their potential use as coating matrices for DES or as materials for fully bioabsorbable vascular stents. MATERIALS AND
methodsFive different polymers, poly(L-lactide) PLLA, poly(D,L-lactide) PDLLA, poly(L-lactide-co-glycolide) P(LLA-co-GA), poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) P(DLLA-co-GA) and poly(L-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone), P(LLA-co-CL) were examined in vitro without and with surface modification. The surface modification of polymers was performed by means of wet-chemical (NaOH and ethylenediamine (EDA)) and plasma-chemical (O2 and NH3) processes. The biocompatibility studies were performed on three different cell types: immortalized mouse fibroblasts (cell line L929), human coronary artery endothelial cells (HCAEC) and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC). The biocompatibility was examined quantitatively using in vitro cytotoxicity assay. Cells were investigated immunocytochemically for expression of specific markers, and morphology was visualized using confocal laser scanning (CLSM) and scanning electron (SEM) microscopy. Additionally, polymer surfaces were examined for their thrombogenicity using an established hemocompatibility test.
resultsBoth endothelial cell types exhibited poor viability and adhesion on all five unmodified polymer surfaces. The biocompatibility of the polymers could be influenced positively by surface modifications. In particular, a reproducible effect was observed for NH3-plasma treatment, which enhanced the cell viability, adhesion and morphology on all five polymeric surfaces.
conclusionSurface modification of polymers can provide a useful approach to enhance their biocompatibility. For clinical application, attempts should be made to stabilize the plasma modification and use it for coupling of biomolecules to accelerate the re-endothelialization of stent surfaces in vivo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.