ArticlePloS one2015
Evaluation and Validation of Assembling Corrected PacBio Long Reads for Microbial Genome Completion via Hybrid Approaches.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Research Progress of Single-Molecule Sequencing and Its Significance in Nucleic Acid Metrology.Biosensors · 2024Review
- Multiple independent losses of the biosynthetic pathway for two tropane alkaloids in the Solanaceae family.Nature communications · 2023Article
- From contigs towards chromosomes: automatic improvement of long read assemblies (ILRA).Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- ARAMIS: From systematic errors of NGS long reads to accurate assemblies.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Unveiling the transcriptomic complexity of Miscanthus sinensis using a combination of PacBio long read- and Illumina short read sequencing platforms.BMC genomics · 2021Article
- Current challenges and best-practice protocols for microbiome analysis.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021Review
- Integration of Genomic and Transcriptomic Data to Elucidate Molecular Processes in Babesia divergens.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021Article
- A chromosome-scale genome assembly of a diploid alfalfa, the progenitor of autotetraploid alfalfa.Horticulture research · 2020Article
- The de novo genome assembly of Tapiscia sinensis and the transcriptomic and developmental bases of androdioecy.Horticulture research · 2020Article
- Multiplexed Non-barcoded Long-Read Sequencing and Assembling Genomes of Bacillus Strains in Error-Free Simulations.Current microbiology · 2020Article
- Dramatic changes in gene expression in different forms of Crithidia fasciculata reveal potential mechanisms for insect-specific adhesion in kinetoplastid parasites.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2019Article
- A Whole Genome Assembly of the Horn Fly,G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2018Article
- Improving draft genome contiguity with reference-derived in silico mate-pair libraries.GigaScience · 2018Article
- Long-Read Sequencing Revealed an Extensive Transcript Complexity in Herpesviruses.Frontiers in genetics · 2018Review
- Lost in plasmids: next generation sequencing and the complex genome of the tick-borne pathogen Borrelia burgdorferi.BMC genomics · 2017Article
- A Case Study into Microbial Genome Assembly Gap Sequences and Finishing Strategies.Frontiers in microbiology · 2017Article
- Whole-Genome Sequence of Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strain BAMCPA07-48, Isolated from a Combat Injury Wound.Genome announcements · 2016Article
- Characterization, correction and de novo assembly of an Oxford Nanopore genomic dataset from Agrobacterium tumefaciens.Scientific reports · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the ever-increasing output of next-generation sequencing data along with developing assemblers, dozens to hundreds of gaps still exist in de novo microbial assemblies due to uneven coverage and large genomic repeats. Third-generation single-molecule, real-time (SMRT) sequencing technology avoids amplification artifacts and generates kilobase-long reads with the potential to complete microbial genome assembly. However, due to the low accuracy (~85%) of third-generation sequences, a considerable amount of long reads (>50X) are required for self-correction and for subsequent de novo assembly. Recently-developed hybrid approaches, using next-generation sequencing data and as few as 5X long reads, have been proposed to improve the completeness of microbial assembly. In this study we have evaluated the contemporary hybrid approaches and demonstrated that assembling corrected long reads (by runCA) produced the best assembly compared to long-read scaffolding (e.g., AHA, Cerulean and SSPACE-LongRead) and gap-filling (SPAdes). For generating corrected long reads, we further examined long-read correction tools, such as ECTools, LSC, LoRDEC, PBcR pipeline and proovread. We have demonstrated that three microbial genomes including Escherichia coli K12 MG1655, Meiothermus ruber DSM1279 and Pdeobacter heparinus DSM2366 were successfully hybrid assembled by runCA into near-perfect assemblies using ECTools-corrected long reads. In addition, we developed a tool, Patch, which implements corrected long reads and pre-assembled contigs as inputs, to enhance microbial genome assemblies. With the additional 20X long reads, short reads of S. cerevisiae W303 were hybrid assembled into 115 contigs using the verified strategy, ECTools + runCA. Patch was subsequently applied to upgrade the assembly to a 35-contig draft genome. Our evaluation of the hybrid approaches shows that assembling the ECTools-corrected long reads via runCA generates near complete microbial genomes, suggesting that genome assembly could benefit from re-analyzing the available hybrid datasets that were not assembled in an optimal fashion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.