Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26641453›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

In Vivo Fate Imaging of Intracerebral Stem Cell Grafts in Mouse Brain.

Annette Tennstaedt, Alfonso Mastropietro, Melanie Nelles, Andreas Beyrau, Mathias Hoehn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Perfluorocarbons: A perspective of theranostic applications and challenges.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  4. Perfluorocarbons-BasedInternational journal of nanomedicine · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Fluorescent Cell Imaging in Regenerative Medicine.Biomedical engineering and computational biology · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Annette TennstaedtIn-vivo-NMR Laboratory, Max Planck Institute for Metabolism Research, Cologne, Germany.
Alfonso MastropietroIn-vivo-NMR Laboratory, Max Planck Institute for Metabolism Research, Cologne, Germany.
Melanie NellesIn-vivo-NMR Laboratory, Max Planck Institute for Metabolism Research, Cologne, Germany.
Andreas BeyrauIn-vivo-NMR Laboratory, Max Planck Institute for Metabolism Research, Cologne, Germany.
Mathias HoehnIn-vivo-NMR Laboratory, Max Planck Institute for Metabolism Research, Cologne, Germany.
Max Planck Institute for Metabolism Research · DEPolitecnico di Milano · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We generated transgenic human neural stem cells (hNSCs) stably expressing the reporter genes Luciferase for bioluminescence imaging (BLI) and GFP for fluorescence imaging, for multimodal imaging investigations. These transgenic hNSCs were further labeled with a clinically approved perfluoropolyether to perform parallel 19F MRI studies. In vitro validation demonstrated normal cell proliferation and differentiation of the transgenic and additionally labeled hNSCs, closely the same as the wild type cell line, making them suitable for in vivo application. Labeled and unlabeled transgenic hNSCs were implanted into the striatum of mouse brain. The time profile of their cell fate after intracerebral grafting was monitored during nine days following implantation with our multimodal imaging approach, assessing both functional and anatomical condition. The 19F MRI demarcated the graft location and permitted to estimate the cell number in the graft. BLI showed a pronounce cell loss during this monitoring period, indicated by the decrease of the viability signal. The in vivo obtained cell fate results were further validated and confirmed by immunohistochemistry. We could show that the surviving cells of the graft continued to differentiate into early neurons, while the severe cell loss could be explained by an inflammatory reaction to the graft, showing the graft being surrounded by activated microglia and macrophages. These results are different from earlier cell survival studies of our group where we had implanted the identical cells into the same mouse strain but in the cortex and not in the striatum. The cortical transplanted cells did not show any loss in viability but only pronounced and continuous neuronal differentiation.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationCell LineCell ProliferationCerebral CortexFluorine RadioisotopesGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHumansLuciferases, FireflyLuminescent MeasurementsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMice, NudeMultimodal ImagingNeural Stem CellsTransgenesFluorine RadioisotopesGreen Fluorescent ProteinsLuciferases, Firefly

Identifiers

PMID26641453
PMCPMC4671578
OpenAlexW2288240510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.