ArticlePloS one2015
Semi-Supervised Multi-View Learning for Gene Network Reconstruction.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-class boosting for the analysis of multiple incomplete views on microbiome data.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- A toolbox of machine learning software to support microbiome analysis.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Review
- Multi-task learning for the simultaneous reconstruction of the human and mouse gene regulatory networks.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Prediction of new associations between ncRNAs and diseases exploiting multi-type hierarchical clustering.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- In silico prediction of potential miRNA-disease association using an integrative bioinformatics approach based on kernel fusion.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2020Article
- Network inference with ensembles of bi-clustering trees.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Integration of Bioinformatic Predictions and Experimental Data to Identify circRNA-miRNA Associations.Genes · 2019Review
- Extensive evaluation of the generalized relevance network approach to inferring gene regulatory networks.GigaScience · 2018Article
- Article
- Nonlinear Network Reconstruction from Gene Expression Data Using Marginal Dependencies Measured by DCOL.PloS one · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The task of gene regulatory network reconstruction from high-throughput data is receiving increasing attention in recent years. As a consequence, many inference methods for solving this task have been proposed in the literature. It has been recently observed, however, that no single inference method performs optimally across all datasets. It has also been shown that the integration of predictions from multiple inference methods is more robust and shows high performance across diverse datasets. Inspired by this research, in this paper, we propose a machine learning solution which learns to combine predictions from multiple inference methods. While this approach adds additional complexity to the inference process, we expect it would also carry substantial benefits. These would come from the automatic adaptation to patterns on the outputs of individual inference methods, so that it is possible to identify regulatory interactions more reliably when these patterns occur. This article demonstrates the benefits (in terms of accuracy of the reconstructed networks) of the proposed method, which exploits an iterative, semi-supervised ensemble-based algorithm. The algorithm learns to combine the interactions predicted by many different inference methods in the multi-view learning setting. The empirical evaluation of the proposed algorithm on a prokaryotic model organism (E. coli) and on a eukaryotic model organism (S. cerevisiae) clearly shows improved performance over the state of the art methods. The results indicate that gene regulatory network reconstruction for the real datasets is more difficult for S. cerevisiae than for E. coli. The software, all the datasets used in the experiments and all the results are available for download at the following link: http://figshare.com/articles/Semi_supervised_Multi_View_Learning_for_Gene_Network_Reconstruction/1604827.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.