ArticleSpringerPlus2015
Joint line restoration during revision total knee arthroplasty: an accurate and reliable method.
Article in SpringerPlus, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The negative effect of joint line elevation after total knee arthroplasty on outcome.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2019Pooled it
- Manual versus robotic-assisted revision total knee arthroplasty for instability : a one-year cohort analysis.Bone & joint open · 2026Article
- Impact of Joint Line Displacement on Function and Quality of Life After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Joint line elevation after TKA is higher in patients with metaphyseal deformity: a prospective study.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2025Article
- Estimation of adductor ratio in the Indian population: Is it a reliable indicator for recreating joint line of the knee?Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025Article
- An MRI-Derived Formula for Estimating the Native Joint Line Position in the Presence of Distal Femoral Bone Loss.Cureus · 2024Article
- Robotic-assisted revision total knee arthroplasty: a novel surgical technique.Arthroplasty (London, England) · 2023Article
- The reliability of adductor tubercle as an anatomical landmark for joint line restoration in revision knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.Annals of translational medicine · 2021Review
- Joint line reestablishment in revision total knee arthroplasty.Arthroplasty (London, England) · 2020Article
- Using anatomical landmarks to calculate the normal joint line position in Chinese people: an observational study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2018Observational
- Good clinical and radiographic outcome of cementless metal metaphyseal sleeves in total knee arthroplasty.Acta orthopaedica · 2018Article
- The medial and lateral epicondyle as a reliable landmark for intra-operative joint line determination in revision knee arthroplasty.Bone & joint research · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During revision total knee arthroplasty, the joint line is frequently malpositioned, due to the disappearance of the anatomical landmarks following previous interventions. This leads to decreased clinical outcome and increased risk of re-intervention. Many methods have been proposed to restore the joint line, but none of them has shown itself to be reliable. We describe an accurate and precise method to localize the exact position of the joint line which guarantees a better clinical knee score. The adductor tubercle (AT) is recognized to be the most reliable landmark used to localize the knee joint line (JL). The distance from the AT to the JL on antero-posterior radiographs (ATJL) and the femoral diameter (FD) on true lateral views were measured on 200 randomly selected normal knees. These measurements were tested for intra- and inter-observer differences. Then, the relationship between these two measurements was studied. A significant correlation and linear regression between FD and ATJL was found (p < 0.001), making the adductor tubercle a valid landmark to accurately position the prosthetic joint within 4 mm from the normal position. No significant difference was noted in the intra and inter-observer measurements (F test not significant). Sex was found to be an intervening variable (p ˂ 0.001). The correlation and regression between ATJL and FD had to be adjusted accordingly. Once the ATJL was determined preoperatively, the JL level is found during surgery by using a caliper that is held on the easily palpable AT. Knowing the femoral diameter, we can easily locate the joint line level surgically, using the adductor tubercle as a landmark. This method leads to better clinical outcomes and a reduced risk of re-intervention following revision total knee arthroplasty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.