Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26640708›Full record

ArticlePain research and treatment2015

Comparison of Dry Needling versus Orthopedic Manual Therapy in Patients with Myofascial Chronic Neck Pain: A Single-Blind, Randomized Pilot Study.

Irene Campa-Moran, Etelvina Rey-Gudin, Josué Fernández-Carnero, Alba Paris-Alemany, Alfonso Gil-Martinez, Sergio Lerma Lara, Almudena Prieto-Baquero, José Luis Alonso-Perez, Roy La Touche

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain research and treatment, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02705131 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Balance Chiropractic Therapy for Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy: a Randomized Parallel-controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorFeng YangRan2016 to 2017Enrolled240ConditionsCervical RadiculopathyArmsBalance Chiropractic Therapy, Traction Therapy
NCT04568915 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Comparison Between Dry Needling and Maitland Joint Mobilization Techniques in Patients With Myofacial Chronic Neck Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2019 to 2020Enrolled30ConditionsMyofacial Pain, Neck PainArmsDry Needling, Maitland Mobilization
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Massage for neck pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Irene Campa-MoranFaculty of Health Science, Department of Physiotherapy, The Center for Advanced Studies University La Salle, Faculty of Health Science, The Autonomous University of Madrid, Aravaca, Madrid, Spain.
Etelvina Rey-GudinFaculty of Health Science, Department of Physiotherapy, The Center for Advanced Studies University La Salle, Faculty of Health Science, The Autonomous University of Madrid, Aravaca, Madrid, Spain.
Josué Fernández-CarneroDepartment of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, King Juan Carlos University, Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain ; Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain ; Motion in Brains Research Group, The Center for Advanced Studies University La Salle, The Autonomous University of Madrid, Spain.
Alba Paris-AlemanyFaculty of Health Science, Department of Physiotherapy, The Center for Advanced Studies University La Salle, Faculty of Health Science, The Autonomous University of Madrid, Aravaca, Madrid, Spain ; Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain ; Motion in Brains Research Group, The Center for Advanced Studies University La Salle, The Autonomous University of Madrid, Spain ; Institute of Neuroscience and Craniofacial Pain (INDCRAN), Madrid, Spain.
Alfonso Gil-MartinezFaculty of Health Science, Department of Physiotherapy, The Center for Advanced Studies University La Salle, Faculty of Health Science, The Autonomous University of Madrid, Aravaca, Madrid, Spain ; Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain ; Motion in Brains Research Group, The Center for Advanced Studies University La Salle, The Autonomous University of Madrid, Spain ; Institute of Neuroscience and Craniofacial Pain (INDCRAN), Madrid, Spain.
Sergio Lerma LaraFaculty of Health Science, Department of Physiotherapy, The Center for Advanced Studies University La Salle, Faculty of Health Science, The Autonomous University of Madrid, Aravaca, Madrid, Spain ; Motion in Brains Research Group, The Center for Advanced Studies University La Salle, The Autonomous University of Madrid, Spain ; Movement Analysis Laboratory, University Hospital Niño Jesus, Madrid, Spain.
Almudena Prieto-BaqueroDepartment of Physiotherapy, European University of Madrid, Villaviciosa de Odón, Madrid, Spain.
José Luis Alonso-PerezDepartment of Physiotherapy, European University of Madrid, Villaviciosa de Odón, Madrid, Spain.
Roy La ToucheFaculty of Health Science, Department of Physiotherapy, The Center for Advanced Studies University La Salle, Faculty of Health Science, The Autonomous University of Madrid, Aravaca, Madrid, Spain ; Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain ; Motion in Brains Research Group, The Center for Advanced Studies University La Salle, The Autonomous University of Madrid, Spain ; Institute of Neuroscience and Craniofacial Pain (INDCRAN), Madrid, Spain.
Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research · ESUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid · ESUniversidad Europea de Madrid · ESHospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of three interventions for the treatment of myofascial chronic neck pain. Methods. Thirty-six patients were randomly assigned to one of three intervention groups: orthopedic manual therapy (OMT), dry needling and stretching (DN-S), and soft tissue techniques (STT). All groups received two treatment sessions with a 48 h time interval. Outcome measures included neck pain intensity measured using a visual analogue scale, cervical range of motion (ROM), pressure pain threshold for measuring mechanical hyperalgesia, and two self-reported questionnaires (neck disability index and pain catastrophizing scale). Results. The ANOVA revealed significant differences for the group × time interaction for neck disability, neck pain intensity, and pain catastrophizing. The DN-S and OMT groups reduced neck disability. Only the OMT group showed decreases in mechanical hyperalgesia and pain catastrophizing. The cervical ROM increased in OMT (i.e., flexion, side-bending, and rotation) and DN-S (i.e., side-bending and rotation) groups. Conclusions. The three interventions are all effective in reducing pain intensity. Reduction in mechanical hyperalgesia and pain catastrophizing was only observed in the OMT group. Cervical ROM improved in the DN-S and OMT groups and also neck disability being only clinically relevant for OMT group.

Identifiers

PMID26640708
PMCPMC4657116
OpenAlexW2174876798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.