Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26640690›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2015

GenomeTester4: a toolkit for performing basic set operations - union, intersection and complement on k-mer lists.

Lauris Kaplinski, Maarja Lepamets, Maido Remm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A survey of k-mer methods and applications in bioinformatics.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The origin and widespread occurrence of Sli-based self-compatibility in potato.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lauris KaplinskiDepartment of Bioinformatics, University of Tartu, Riia 23, Tartu, 51010 Estonia ; Estonian Biocentre, Riia 23B, Tartu, 51010 Estonia.
Maarja LepametsDepartment of Bioinformatics, University of Tartu, Riia 23, Tartu, 51010 Estonia.
Maido RemmDepartment of Bioinformatics, University of Tartu, Riia 23, Tartu, 51010 Estonia ; Estonian Biocentre, Riia 23B, Tartu, 51010 Estonia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundK-mer-based methods of genome analysis have attracted great interest because they do not require genome assembly and can be performed directly on sequencing reads. Many analysis tasks require one to compare k-mer lists from different sequences to find words that are either unique to a specific sequence or common to many sequences. However, no stand-alone k-mer analysis tool currently allows one to perform these algebraic set operations.

findingsWe have developed the GenomeTester4 toolkit, which contains a novel tool GListCompare for performing union, intersection and complement (difference) set operations on k-mer lists. We provide examples of how these general operations can be combined to solve a variety of biological analysis tasks.

conclusionsGenomeTester4 can be used to simplify k-mer list manipulation for many biological analysis tasks.

Indexed as

GenomeSoftwareAnimalsGenomicsHumansSequence Analysis, DNAK-mersNext-generation sequencingSequence analysis

Identifiers

PMID26640690
PMCPMC4669650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.