Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26640677›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2015

Predictors of male insemination success in the mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki).

Megan L Head, Regina Vega-Trejo, Frances Jacomb, Michael D Jennions

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Megan L HeadDivision of Evolution, Ecology and Genetics Research School of Biology Australian National University Acton Canberra Australian Capital Territory 0200 Australia.
Regina Vega-TrejoDivision of Evolution, Ecology and Genetics Research School of Biology Australian National University Acton Canberra Australian Capital Territory 0200 Australia.
Frances JacombDivision of Evolution, Ecology and Genetics Research School of Biology Australian National University Acton Canberra Australian Capital Territory 0200 Australia.
Michael D JennionsDivision of Evolution, Ecology and Genetics Research School of Biology Australian National University Acton Canberra Australian Capital Territory 0200 Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying targets of selection is key to understanding the evolution of sexually selected behavioral and morphological traits. Many animals have coercive mating, yet little is known about whether and how mate choice operates when these are the dominant mating tactic. Here, we use multivariate selection analysis to examine the direction and shape of selection on male insemination success in the mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki). We found direct selection on only one of five measured traits, but correlational selection involving all five traits. Larger males with longer gonopodia and with intermediate sperm counts were more likely to inseminate females than smaller males with shorter gonopodia and extreme sperm counts. Our results highlight the need to investigate sexual selection using a multivariate framework even in species that lack complex sexual signals. Further, female choice appears to be important in driving the evolution of male sexual traits in this species where sexual coercion is the dominant mating tactic.

Indexed as

Correlational selectioninsemination successmate choicemating successpoeciliid

Identifiers

PMID26640677
PMCPMC4662323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.