Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26640522›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary applications2015

Impacts of local adaptation of forest trees on associations with herbivorous insects: implications for adaptive forest management.

Frazer H Sinclair, Graham N Stone, James A Nicholls, Stephen Cavers, Melanie Gibbs, Philip Butterill, Stefanie Wagner, Alexis Ducousso, Sophie Gerber, Rémy J Petit and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary applications, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Frazer H SinclairInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh Edinburgh, UK ; Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Wallingford, UK.
Graham N StoneInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh Edinburgh, UK.
James A NichollsInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh Edinburgh, UK.
Stephen CaversCentre for Ecology and Hydrology Edinburgh, UK.
Melanie GibbsCentre for Ecology and Hydrology Wallingford, UK.
Philip ButterillCentre for Ecology and Hydrology Wallingford, UK ; Faculty of Science, Biology Center, The Czech Academy of Sciences, University of South Bohemia České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
Stefanie WagnerINRA, UMR 1202 BIOGECO Cestas, France ; UMR 1202 BIOGECO, University of Bordeaux Talence, France.
Alexis DucoussoINRA, UMR 1202 BIOGECO Cestas, France ; UMR 1202 BIOGECO, University of Bordeaux Talence, France.
Sophie GerberINRA, UMR 1202 BIOGECO Cestas, France ; UMR 1202 BIOGECO, University of Bordeaux Talence, France.
Rémy J PetitINRA, UMR 1202 BIOGECO Cestas, France ; UMR 1202 BIOGECO, University of Bordeaux Talence, France.
Antoine KremerINRA, UMR 1202 BIOGECO Cestas, France ; UMR 1202 BIOGECO, University of Bordeaux Talence, France.
Karsten SchönroggeCentre for Ecology and Hydrology Wallingford, UK.
CEA CESTA · FRUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBSewanee: The University of the South · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disruption of species interactions is a key issue in climate change biology. Interactions involving forest trees may be particularly vulnerable due to evolutionary rate limitations imposed by long generation times. One mitigation strategy for such impacts is Climate matching - the augmentation of local native tree populations by input from nonlocal populations currently experiencing predicted future climates. This strategy is controversial because of potential cascading impacts on locally adapted animal communities. We explored these impacts using abundance data for local native gallwasp herbivores sampled from 20 provenances of sessile oak (Quercus petraea) planted in a common garden trial. We hypothesized that non-native provenances would show (i) declining growth performance with increasing distance between provenance origin and trial site, and (ii) phenological differences to local oaks that increased with latitudinal differences between origin and trial site. Under a local adaptation hypothesis, we predicted declining gallwasp abundance with increasing phenological mismatch between native and climate-matched trees. Both hypotheses for oaks were supported. Provenance explained significant variation in gallwasp abundance, but no gall type showed the relationship between abundance and phenological mismatch predicted by a local adaptation hypothesis. Our results show that climate matching would have complex and variable impacts on oak gall communities.

Indexed as

adaptive forest managementclimate matchinggallwasplocal adaptationplant–insect interactionspopulation nonindependenceprovenance trialsQuercus petraea

Identifiers

PMID26640522
PMCPMC4662346
OpenAlexW1950577542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.