Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26640510›Full record

ArticleNano today2015

Nanoparticle Uptake: The Phagocyte Problem.

Heather Herd Gustafson, Dolly Holt-Casper, David W Grainger, Hamidreza Ghandehari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nano today, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 585 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
585citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

585 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

525 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Heather Herd GustafsonUniversity of Utah, Department of Bioengineering, 36 S. Wasatch Dr, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 USA ; University of Utah, Utah Center for Nanomedicine, Nano Institute of Utah, 36 S. Wasatch Dr., Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 USA.
Dolly Holt-CasperUniversity of Utah, Department of Bioengineering, 36 S. Wasatch Dr, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 USA.
David W GraingerUniversity of Utah, Department of Bioengineering, 36 S. Wasatch Dr, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 USA ; University of Utah, Utah Center for Nanomedicine, Nano Institute of Utah, 36 S. Wasatch Dr., Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 USA ; University of Utah, Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Chemistry, 30 South 2000 East, Rm 301, Salt Lake City, UT USA 84112.
Hamidreza GhandehariUniversity of Utah, Department of Bioengineering, 36 S. Wasatch Dr, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 USA ; University of Utah, Utah Center for Nanomedicine, Nano Institute of Utah, 36 S. Wasatch Dr., Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 USA ; University of Utah, Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Chemistry, 30 South 2000 East, Rm 301, Salt Lake City, UT USA 84112.

Funding

BIOLOGICAL FATE AND BIOCOMPATIBILITY OF SILICA-BASED NANOCONSTRUCTSR01ES024681 · NIEHS · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Hamid Ghandehari · 2014 to 2026
$4.1M
Molecular Comparison of Macrophage Foreign Body ResponseR01EB000894 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI GRAINGER, DAVID W · 2004 to 2007
$1.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB000894NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES024681
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phagocytes are key cellular participants determining important aspects of host exposure to nanomaterials, initiating clearance, biodistribution and the tenuous balance between host tolerance and adverse nanotoxicity. Macrophages in particular are believed to be among the first and primary cell types that process nanoparticles, mediating host inflammatory and immunological biological responses. These processes occur ubiquitously throughout tissues where nanomaterials are present, including the host mononuclear phagocytic system (MPS) residents in dedicated host filtration organs (i.e., liver, kidney spleen, and lung). Thus, to understand nanomaterials exposure risks it is critical to understand how nanomaterials are recognized, internalized, trafficked and distributed within diverse types of host macrophages and how possible cell-based reactions resulting from nanomaterial exposures further inflammatory host responses in vivo. This review focuses on describing macrophage-based initiation of downstream hallmark immunological and inflammatory processes resulting from phagocyte exposure to and internalization of nanomaterials.

Indexed as

biodistributioncirculationclearancedrug deliveryimagingmacrophagetoxicity

Identifiers

PMID26640510
PMCPMC4666556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.