ArticleFrontiers in genetics2015
Identification of Low-Confidence Regions in the Pig Reference Genome (Sscrofa10.2).
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of a whole-exome sequencing kit to facilitate porcine biomedical research.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Genome-wide detection of CNV regions and their potential association with growth and fatness traits in Duroc pigs.BMC genomics · 2021Article
- Article
- An improved pig reference genome sequence to enable pig genetics and genomics research.GigaScience · 2020Article
- CNV analysis of Meishan pig by next-generation sequencing and effects ofJournal of animal science and biotechnology · 2020Article
- CNVcaller: highly efficient and widely applicable software for detecting copy number variations in large populations.GigaScience · 2017Article
- RNA sequencing reveals candidate genes and polymorphisms related to sperm DNA integrity in testis tissue from boars.BMC veterinary research · 2017Article
- Rapid Increase in Genome Size as a Consequence of Transposable Element Hyperactivity in Wood-White (Leptidea) Butterflies.Genome biology and evolution · 2017Article
- Estimating error models for whole genome sequencing using mixtures of Dirichlet-multinomial distributions.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2017Article
- Article
- Genome-wide association study confirm major QTL for backfat fatty acid composition on SSC14 in Duroc pigs.BMC genomics · 2017Article
- Article
- Genome-wide analysis of structural variants reveals genetic differences in Chinese pigs.PloS one · 2017Article
- Article
- Article
- gEVAL - a web-based browser for evaluating genome assemblies.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2016Article
- A decade of pig genome sequencing: a window on pig domestication and evolution.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2016Review
- Major Improvements to the Heliconius melpomene Genome Assembly Used to Confirm 10 Chromosome Fusion Events in 6 Million Years of Butterfly Evolution.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2016Article
- Whole genome SNPs discovery in Nero Siciliano pig.Genetics and molecular biologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Many applications of high throughput sequencing rely on the availability of an accurate reference genome. Variant calling often produces large data sets that cannot be realistically validated and which may contain large numbers of false-positives. Errors in the reference assembly increase the number of false-positives. While resources are available to aid in the filtering of variants from human data, for other species these do not yet exist and strict filtering techniques must be employed which are more likely to exclude true-positives. This work assesses the accuracy of the pig reference genome (Sscrofa10.2) using whole genome sequencing reads from the Duroc sow whose genome the assembly was based on. Indicators of structural variation including high regional coverage, unexpected insert sizes, improper pairing and homozygous variants were used to identify low quality (LQ) regions of the assembly. Low coverage (LC) regions were also identified and analyzed separately. The LQ regions covered 13.85% of the genome, the LC regions covered 26.6% of the genome and combined (LQLC) they covered 33.07% of the genome. Over half of dbSNP variants were located in the LQLC regions. Of copy number variable regions identified in a previous study, 86.3% were located in the LQLC regions. The regions were also enriched for gene predictions from RNA-seq data with 42.98% falling in the LQLC regions. Excluding variants in the LQ, LC, or LQLC from future analyses will help reduce the number of false-positive variant calls. Researchers using WGS data should be aware that the current pig reference genome does not give an accurate representation of the copy number of alleles in the original Duroc sow's genome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.