ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2015
The Anti-Phytophthora Effect of Selected Potato-Associated Pseudomonas Strains: From the Laboratory to the Field.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Plant growth-promoting Pseudomonas strains modulate potato tuberization signalling and development.Journal of experimental botany · 2026Article
- Native Bacteria Are Effective Biocontrol Agents at a Wide Range of Temperatures ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Unveiling the microbiome of hydroponically cultivated lettuce: impact of Phytophthora cryptogea infection on plant-associated microorganisms.FEMS microbiology ecology · 2024Article
- Harnessing microbial communities for enhanced plant resilience against diseases.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Anti-Oomycete Activity and Pepper Root Colonization of Pseudomonas plecoglossicida YJR13 and Pseudomonas putida YJR92 against Phytophthora capsici.The plant pathology journal · 2023Article
- Evaluating the Antagonistic Potential of Actinomycete Strains Isolated From Sudan's Soils AgainstFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Biological Control of Oomycete Soilborne Diseases Caused byMycobiology · 2022Article
- Microbiome for sustainable agriculture: a review with special reference to the corn production system.Archives of microbiology · 2021Review
- 16S rRNA gene-based microbiome analysis identifies candidate bacterial strains that increase the storage time of potato tubers.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Plant Endophytic Fungus Extract ZNC Improved Potato Immunity, Yield, and Quality.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Characterization of native plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and their anti-oomycete potential against Phytophthora capsici affecting chilli pepper (Capsicum annum L.).Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Contribution of Hydrogen Cyanide to the Antagonistic Activity ofMicroorganisms · 2020Article
- Linking Comparative Genomics of Nine Potato-AssociatedFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- A sulfur-containing volatile emitted by potato-associated bacteria confers protection against late blight through direct anti-oomycete activity.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- The bacterial community in potato is recruited from soil and partly inherited across generations.PloS one · 2019Article
- Combining Different Potato-AssociatedFrontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
- Biocontrol of Orchid-pathogenic Mold,Mycobiology · 2018Article
- Aquatic Pseudomonads Inhibit Oomycete Plant Pathogens ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
- Mining the Volatilomes of Plant-Associated Microbiota for New Biocontrol Solutions.Frontiers in microbiology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Late blight, caused by the oomycete Phytophthora infestans, is the most devastating disease of potato. In organic farming, late blight is controlled by repeated applications of copper-based products, which negatively impact the environment. To find alternative solutions for late blight management, we have previously isolated a large collection of bacteria from the phyllosphere and the rhizosphere of potatoes. Here we report the antagonistic potential of these strains when co-cultivated with P. infestans as well as with other potato pathogens. We then focused on three Pseudomonas strains and compared their protective impact against late blight to that of well-known biocontrol strains in planta using a high-throughput leaf disk assay with automated picture analysis. When sprayed on the leaves of potatoes in the greenhouse, the strains were able to survive for at least 15 days. Under field conditions, populations decreased faster but all tested strains could still be retrieved after 8 days. The most active strain in vitro, P. chlororaphis R47, was also the best protectant on leaf disks from plants grown in the greenhouse experiment, but its protection potential could not be verified in the field due to unfavorable infection conditions. However, its protective effect against P. infestans in planta, its survival in the phyllosphere as well as its ability to colonize the potato rhizosphere in very high population densities, suggest a potential for field application, e.g., in the form of tuber treatment or leaf spray.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.