Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26640427›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2015

Whole-Brain In-vivo Measurements of the Axonal G-Ratio in a Group of 37 Healthy Volunteers.

Siawoosh Mohammadi, Daniel Carey, Fred Dick, Joern Diedrichsen, Martin I Sereno, Marco Reisert, Martina F Callaghan, Nikolaus Weiskopf

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. MyelinASN neuro · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Fiber-orientation independent component of RFrontiers in neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Siawoosh MohammadiDepartment of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf Hamburg, Germany ; Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK.
Daniel CareyBirkbeck/UCL Centre for NeuroImaging, Birkbeck College London, UK.
Fred DickBirkbeck/UCL Centre for NeuroImaging, Birkbeck College London, UK.
Joern DiedrichsenUCL Institute of Cognitive Neurology, University College London London, UK.
Martin I SerenoBirkbeck/UCL Centre for NeuroImaging, Birkbeck College London, UK.
Marco ReisertMedical Physics, Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Freiburg Freiburg, Germany.
Martina F CallaghanWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK.
Nikolaus WeiskopfWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK ; Department of Neurophysics, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences Leipzig, Germany.
University College London · GBBirkbeck, University of London · GBMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences · DEUniversity Medical Center Freiburg · DEWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging · GB

Funding

European Research Council 616905Wellcome Trust 091593
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The g-ratio, quantifying the ratio between the inner and outer diameters of a fiber, is an important microstructural characteristic of fiber pathways and is functionally related to conduction velocity. We introduce a novel method for estimating the MR g-ratio non-invasively across the whole brain using high-fidelity magnetization transfer (MT) imaging and single-shell diffusion MRI. These methods enabled us to map the MR g-ratio in vivo across the brain's prominent fiber pathways in a group of 37 healthy volunteers and to estimate the inter-subject variability. Effective correction of susceptibility-related distortion artifacts was essential before combining the MT and diffusion data, in order to reduce partial volume and edge artifacts. The MR g-ratio is in good qualitative agreement with histological findings despite the different resolution and spatial coverage of MRI and histology. The MR g-ratio holds promise as an important non-invasive biomarker due to its microstructural and functional relevance in neurodegeneration.

Indexed as

diffusion MRIDTIfiber volume fractiong-ratioin-vivo histologymagnetization transfer imagingmulti-parameter mappingmyelin volume fraction

Identifiers

PMID26640427
PMCPMC4661323
OpenAlexW2175340201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.