Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26640346›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2015

Transanal total mesorectal excision: Towards standardization of technique.

Albert M Wolthuis, Gabriele Bislenghi, Anthony de Buck van Overstraeten, André D'Hoore

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Transanal Total Proctocolectomy with Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis for Synchronous Triple Colorectal Cancer.Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part B, Videoscopy · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Transanal TME - really needed?Innovative surgical sciences · 2018
    Review
  15. Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision: Why, When, and How.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Albert M WolthuisAlbert M Wolthuis, Gabriele Bislenghi, Anthony de Buck van Overstraeten, André D'Hoore, Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospital Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Gabriele BislenghiAlbert M Wolthuis, Gabriele Bislenghi, Anthony de Buck van Overstraeten, André D'Hoore, Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospital Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Anthony de Buck van OverstraetenAlbert M Wolthuis, Gabriele Bislenghi, Anthony de Buck van Overstraeten, André D'Hoore, Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospital Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
André D'HooreAlbert M Wolthuis, Gabriele Bislenghi, Anthony de Buck van Overstraeten, André D'Hoore, Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospital Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
KU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo describe the role of Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) in minimally invasive rectal cancer surgery, to examine the differences in patient selection and in reported surgical techniques and their impacts on postoperative outcomes and to discuss the future of TaTME.

methodsMEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library were systematically searched through the 1(st) of March 2015 using a predefined search strategy.

resultsA total of 20 studies with 323 patients were included. Most studies were single-arm prospective studies with fewer than 100 patients. Multiple transanal access platforms were used, and the laparoscopic approach was either multi- or single port. The procedure was initiated transanally or transabdominally. If a simultaneous approach with 2 operating surgeons was chosen, the operative time was significantly reduced.

conclusionTaTME was also associated with better TME specimens and a longer distal resection margin. TaTME is thus feasible in expert hands, but the learning curve and safety profile are not well defined. Long-term follow-up regarding anal function and oncological outcomes should be performed in the future.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overClinical CompetenceFemaleHumansLaparoscopyLearning CurveMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRectumRisk FactorsTransanal Endoscopic SurgeryTreatment OutcomeColorectal surgeryLaparoscopyNatural orifice specimen extractionRectal cancerReverse total mesorectal excisionTotal mesorectal excisionTransanalTransanal minimally invasive surgeryTransanal total mesorectal excision

Identifiers

PMID26640346
PMCPMC4658624
OpenAlexW2413667739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.