Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26640286›Full record

ArticleGeburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde2012

Breast Cancer: State of the Art and New Findings.

C Melcher, C Scholz, B Jäger, C Hagenbeck, B Rack, W Janni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Upper Blepharoplasty for Areola Reconstruction.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2013
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

C MelcherWomen's Clinic, Hospital of the Heinrich Heine University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf.
C ScholzWomen's Clinic, Hospital of the Heinrich Heine University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf.
B JägerDepartment and Outpatient Clinic for Gynaecology and Obstetrics - Innenstadt, Hospital of the Ludwig Maximilian , University of Munich, Munich.
C HagenbeckWomen's Clinic, Hospital of the Heinrich Heine University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf.
B RackDepartment and Outpatient Clinic for Gynaecology and Obstetrics - Innenstadt, Hospital of the Ludwig Maximilian , University of Munich, Munich.
W JanniWomen's Clinic, Hospital of the Heinrich Heine University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in research have a highly influential role to play in the strategy of early detection, treatment and aftercare of breast cancer and therefore everyday clinical practice. Newly-defined prognosis factors and a new form of molecular subtype classification, for example, are intended to help identify patients who will actually benefit from chemotherapy. In the field of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the inclusion of the angiogenesis inhibitor Bevacizumab and dual antiHER2 therapy is being discussed. What's more, where defined criteria are met, even with positive sentinel lymph nodes, axillary dissection is not performed; besides bisphosphonates RANKL antibody Denosumab is now an option in the treatment of bone metastases.

Indexed as

breast cancerchemotherapyendocrine therapymolecular genetic subtypesprognosisradiotherapytargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID26640286
PMCPMC4651153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.