Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26640149›Full record

ArticleOncogene2016

Combined loss of PUMA and p21 accelerates c-MYC-driven lymphoma development considerably less than loss of one allele of p53.

L J Valente, S Grabow, C J Vandenberg, A Strasser, A Janic

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogene, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cross-talk between Myc and p53 in B-cell lymphomas.Chronic diseases and translational medicine · 2019
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Deciphering p53 signaling in tumor suppression.Current opinion in cell biology · 2018
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L J ValenteThe Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Molecular Genetics of Cancer Division, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
S GrabowThe Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Molecular Genetics of Cancer Division, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0467-7871
C J VandenbergThe Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Molecular Genetics of Cancer Division, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
A StrasserThe Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Molecular Genetics of Cancer Division, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
A JanicThe Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Molecular Genetics of Cancer Division, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
The University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tumor suppressor p53 is mutated in ~50% of human cancers. P53 is activated by a range of stimuli and regulates several cellular processes, including apoptotic cell death, cell cycle arrest, senescence and DNA repair. P53 induces apoptosis via transcriptional induction of the BH3-only proteins PUMA (p53-upregulated modulator of apoptosis) and NOXA, and cell cycle arrest via p21. Induction of these processes was proposed to be critical for p53-mediated tumor suppression. It is therefore surprising that mice lacking PUMA, NOXA and p21, as well as mice bearing mutations in p53 that impair the transcriptional activation of these genes, are not tumor prone, unlike mice lacking p53 function, which spontaneously develop tumors with 100% incidence. These p53 target genes and the processes they regulate may, however, impact differently on tumor development depending on the oncogenic drivers. For example, loss of PUMA enhances c-MYC-driven lymphoma development in mice, but, interestingly, the acceleration was less impressive compared with that caused by the loss of even a single p53 allele. Different studies have reported that loss of p21 can accelerate, delay or have no impact on tumorigenesis. In an attempt to resolve this controversy, we examined whether loss of p21-mediated cell cycle arrest cooperates with PUMA deficiency in accelerating lymphoma development in Eμ-Myc mice (overexpressing c-MYC in B-lymphoid cells). We found that Eμ-Myc mice lacking both p21 and PUMA (Eμ-Myc;Puma(-/-);p21(-/-)) developed lymphoma at a rate comparable to Eμ-Myc;Puma(-/-) animals, notably with considerably longer latency than Eμ-Myc;p53(+/-)mice. Loss of p21 had no impact on the numbers, cycling or survival of pre-leukemic Eμ-Myc B-lymphoid cells, even when PUMA was lost concomitantly. These results demonstrate that even in the context of deregulated c-MYC expression, p53 must suppress tumor development by activating processes apart from, or in addition to, PUMA-mediated apoptosis and p21-induced cell cycle arrest.

Indexed as

AnimalsApoptosis Regulatory ProteinsBlotting, WesternB-LymphocytesCells, CulturedCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21Kaplan-Meier EstimateLoss of HeterozygosityLymphomaMice, KnockoutMice, TransgenicMutationPrecursor Cells, B-LymphoidProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycTumor Suppressor Protein p53Apoptosis Regulatory ProteinsCdkn1a protein, mouseCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21Myc protein, mousePmaip1 protein, mouseProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycPUMA protein, mouseTumor Suppressor Protein p53Tumor Suppressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26640149
OpenAlexW2189779125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.