Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26639183›Full record

ArticleGenetic epidemiology2016

Modeling X Chromosome Data Using Random Forests: Conquering Sex Bias.

Stacey J Winham, Gregory D Jenkins, Joanna M Biernacka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetic epidemiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Viewing the male-specific chromosome Y in a new light.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stacey J WinhamDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.
Gregory D JenkinsDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.
Joanna M BiernackaDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.

Funding

Rochester Epidemiology ProjectR01AG034676 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ROCCA, WALTER A, ST SAUVER, JENNIFER LYNN · 2010 to 2019
$9.5M
Mayo Clinic Interdisciplinary Women's Health Research ProgramK12HD065987 · NICHD · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KANTARCI, KEJAL · 2010 to 2023
$6.7M
Mentored Clinical Career Award in Adolescent Substance AbuseK23DA019570 · NIDA · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI LEVY, SHARON J · 2007 to 2012
$921k
Methods for detecting interacting risk factors for addictionsR21DA027075 · NIDA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI BIERNACKA, JOANNA M · 2010 to 2011
$372k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG034676NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD065987NICHD NIH HHS K12HD065987NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA019570NIDA NIH HHS R21DA019570NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA027075
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning methods, including Random Forests (RF), are increasingly used for genetic data analysis. However, the standard RF algorithm does not correctly model the effects of X chromosome single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), leading to biased estimates of variable importance. We propose extensions of RF to correctly model X SNPs, including a stratified approach and an approach based on the process of X chromosome inactivation. We applied the new and standard RF approaches to case-control alcohol dependence data from the Study of Addiction: Genes and Environment (SAGE), and compared the performance of the alternative approaches via a simulation study. Standard RF applied to a case-control study of alcohol dependence yielded inflated variable importance estimates for X SNPs, even when sex was included as a variable, but the results of the new RF methods were consistent with univariate regression-based approaches that correctly model X chromosome data. Simulations showed that the new RF methods eliminate the bias in standard RF variable importance for X SNPs when sex is associated with the trait, and are able to detect causal autosomal and X SNPs. Even in the absence of sex effects, the new extensions perform similarly to standard RF. Thus, we provide a powerful multimarker approach for genetic analysis that accommodates X chromosome data in an unbiased way. This method is implemented in the freely available R package "snpRF" (http://www.cran.r-project.org/web/packages/snpRF/).

Indexed as

BiasDecision TreesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseAlcoholismAlgorithmsCase-Control StudiesChromosomes, Human, XComputer SimulationData Interpretation, StatisticalGenetic MarkersHumansModels, GeneticPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideSex FactorsGenetic MarkersbiasRandom Forestsex differencesvariable importanceX chromosome

Identifiers

PMID26639183
PMCPMC4724236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.