Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26639181›Full record

ArticleLeukemia2016

A complementary role of multiparameter flow cytometry and high-throughput sequencing for minimal residual disease detection in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: an European Research Initiative on CLL study.

A C Rawstron, C Fazi, A Agathangelidis, N Villamor, R Letestu, J Nomdedeu, C Palacio, O Stehlikova, K-A Kreuzer, S Liptrot and 41 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Leukemia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 120 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
120citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

120 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 237 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Adding Umbralisib and Ublituximab (U2) to Ibrutinib in Patients with CLL: A Phase II Study of an MRD-Driven Approach.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Trial
  8. Minimal Residual Disease Dynamics after Venetoclax-Obinutuzumab Treatment: Extended Off-Treatment Follow-up From the Randomized CLL14 Study.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2021
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Phase II Study of Combination Obinutuzumab, Ibrutinib, and Venetoclax in Treatment-Naïve and Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2020
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Ibrutinib Plus Venetoclax in Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: The CLARITY Study.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2019
    Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Measurable Residual Disease.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

60 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

51 authors at 20 institutions in 12 countries.

A C RawstronHMDS, St James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds, UK.
C FaziIRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy.
A AgathangelidisIRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy.
N VillamorHospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.
R LetestuHôpital Avicenne, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Bobigny, France.
J NomdedeuHospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
C PalacioHospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
O StehlikovaDepartment of Internal Medicine-Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Brno and CEITEC, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
K-A KreuzerUniversity Hospital, Cologne, Germany.
S LiptrotSt James Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
D O'BrienSt James Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
R M de TuteHMDS, St James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds, UK.
I MarinovInstitute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, University Hospital Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
M HauwelUniversity Hospital Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
M SpacekGeneral University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
J DobberDepartment of Hematology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
A P KaterDepartment of Hematology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
P GambellPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
A SoosapillaHematology and Flow Cytometry, Laverty Pathology, Sydney, Australia.
G LozanskiOhio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
G Brachtl3rd Medical Department, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
K LinRoyal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK.
J BoysenDivisions of Hematology and Hematopathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
C HansonDivisions of Hematology and Hematopathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
J L JorgensenMD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
M Stetler-StevensonNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
C YuanNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
H E BroomeMoores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
L RassentiMoores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
F CraigUn1iversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
J DelgadoHospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.
C MorenoHospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
F BoschHospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
A Egle3rd Medical Department, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
M DoubekDepartment of Internal Medicine-Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Brno and CEITEC, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
S PospisilovaDepartment of Internal Medicine-Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Brno and CEITEC, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
S MulliganDepartment of Haematology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
D WestermanPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
C M SandersAdaptive Biotechnologies, Seattle, WA, USA.
R EmersonAdaptive Biotechnologies, Seattle, WA, USA.
H S RobinsAdaptive Biotechnologies, Seattle, WA, USA.
I KirschAdaptive Biotechnologies, Seattle, WA, USA.
T ShanafeltDivisions of Hematology and Hematopathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
A PettittRoyal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK.
T J KippsMoores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
W G WierdaMD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
F CymbalistaHôpital Avicenne, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Bobigny, France.
M HallekUniversity Hospital, Cologne, Germany.
P HillmenLeeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
E MontserratHospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.
P GhiaIRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy.
Adaptive Biotechnologies (United States) · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USAcademic Medical Center · NLCentral European Institute of Technology – Masaryk University · CZHôpital Avicenne · FRHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESHospital de Sant Pau · ESIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITParacelsus Medical University · ATPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AURoyal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital NHS Trust · GBSt. James's Hospital · IESt James's University Hospital · GBThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity Hospital Cologne · DEVall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari · ESConsorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer · ESGeneral University Hospital in Prague · CZInstitute of Haematology and Blood Transfusion · CZ

Funding

Tissue CoreP01CA081534 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI KIPPS, THOMAS J · 2000 to 2016
$59.5M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA081534
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) the level of minimal residual disease (MRD) after therapy is an independent predictor of outcome. Given the increasing number of new agents being explored for CLL therapy, using MRD as a surrogate could greatly reduce the time necessary to assess their efficacy. In this European Research Initiative on CLL (ERIC) project we have identified and validated a flow-cytometric approach to reliably quantitate CLL cells to the level of 0.0010% (10(-5)). The assay comprises a core panel of six markers (i.e. CD19, CD20, CD5, CD43, CD79b and CD81) with a component specification independent of instrument and reagents, which can be locally re-validated using normal peripheral blood. This method is directly comparable to previous ERIC-designed assays and also provides a backbone for investigation of new markers. A parallel analysis of high-throughput sequencing using the ClonoSEQ assay showed good concordance with flow cytometry results at the 0.010% (10(-4)) level, the MRD threshold defined in the 2008 International Workshop on CLL guidelines, but it also provides good linearity to a detection limit of 1 in a million (10(-6)). The combination of both technologies would permit a highly sensitive approach to MRD detection while providing a reproducible and broadly accessible method to quantify residual disease and optimize treatment in CLL.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntigens, CDCombined Modality TherapyEuropeFemaleFlow CytometryFollow-Up StudiesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansImmunophenotypingLeukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellMaleNeoplasm, ResidualNeoplasm StagingPrognosisAntigens, CD

Identifiers

PMID26639181
PMCPMC4832072
OpenAlexW2193060933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.