Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26639116›Full record

ReviewJournal of the International AIDS Society2015

Sequencing paediatric antiretroviral therapy in the context of a public health approach.

Ragna S Boerma, T Sonia Boender, Michael Boele van Hensbroek, Tobias F Rinke de Wit, Kim C E Sigaloff

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Targeting 90-90-90--don't leave children and adolescents behind.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2015
    Article
  9. Getting to 90-90-90 in paediatric HIV: What is needed?Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ragna S BoermaAmsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development and Department of Global Health, Academic Medical Center of the University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
T Sonia BoenderAmsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development and Department of Global Health, Academic Medical Center of the University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Michael Boele van HensbroekGlobal Child Health Group, Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Center of the University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tobias F Rinke de WitAmsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development and Department of Global Health, Academic Medical Center of the University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Kim C E SigaloffAmsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development and Department of Global Health, Academic Medical Center of the University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAs access to prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) efforts has increased, the total number of children being born with HIV has significantly decreased. However, those children who do become infected after PMTCT failure are at particular risk of HIV drug resistance, selected by exposure to maternal or paediatric antiretroviral drugs used before, during or after birth. As a consequence, the response to antiretroviral therapy (ART) in these children may be compromised, particularly when non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) are used as part of the first-line regimen. We review evidence guiding choices of first- and second-line ART. DISCUSSION: Children generally respond relatively well to ART. Clinical trials show the superiority of protease inhibitor (PI)- over NNRTI-based treatment in young children, but observational reports of NNRTI-containing regimens are usually favourable as well. This is reassuring as national guidelines often still recommend the use of NNRTI-based treatment for PMTCT-unexposed young children, due to the higher costs of PIs. After failure of NNRTI-based, first-line treatment, the rate of acquired drug resistance is high, but HIV may well be suppressed by PIs in second-line ART. By contrast, there are currently no adequate alternatives in resource-limited settings (RLS) for children failing either first- or second-line, PI-containing regimens.

conclusionsAffordable salvage treatment options for children in RLS are urgently needed.

Indexed as

Public HealthAnti-HIV AgentsChildHIV InfectionsHumansReverse Transcriptase InhibitorsAnti-HIV AgentsReverse Transcriptase Inhibitorsantiretroviral therapyHIV drug resistancelow- and middle-income countriesnon-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitorpaediatric HIVprotease inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID26639116
PMCPMC4670836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.