Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26639024›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2016

A novel metric for quantification of homogeneous and heterogeneous tumors in PET for enhanced clinical outcome prediction.

Arman Rahmim, C Ross Schmidtlein, Andrew Jackson, Sara Sheikhbahaei, Charles Marcus, Saeed Ashrafinia, Madjid Soltani, Rathan M Subramaniam

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Robustness of Radiomic Features in [Molecular imaging and biology · 2016
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Applications and limitations of radiomics.Physics in medicine and biology · 2016
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Arman RahmimDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
C Ross SchmidtleinDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Andrew JacksonDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Sara SheikhbahaeiDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Charles MarcusDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Saeed AshrafiniaDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Madjid SoltaniDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Rathan M SubramaniamDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Atlases to Report and Correlate Radiotherapy Dose Distributions with OutcomesR01CA129182 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI JACKSON, ANDREW · 2009 to 2013
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA129182NCI NIH HHS R01CA129182
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oncologic PET images provide valuable information that can enable enhanced prognosis of disease. Nonetheless, such information is simplified significantly in routine clinical assessment to meet workflow constraints. Examples of typical FDG PET metrics include: (i) SUVmax, (2) total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and (3) metabolic tumor volume (MTV). We have derived and implemented a novel metric for tumor quantification, inspired in essence by a model of generalized equivalent uniform dose as used in radiation therapy. The proposed metric, denoted generalized effective total uptake (gETU), is attractive as it encompasses the abovementioned commonly invoked metrics, and generalizes them, for both homogeneous and heterogeneous tumors, using a single parameter a. We evaluated this new metric for improved overall survival (OS) prediction on two different baseline FDG PET/CT datasets: (a) 113 patients with squamous cell cancer of the oropharynx, and (b) 72 patients with locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed, where the subjects were subdivided into two groups using the median threshold, from which the hazard ratios (HR) were computed in Cox proportional hazards regression. For the oropharyngeal cancer dataset, MTV, TLG, SUVmax, SUVmean and SUVpeak produced HR values of 1.86, 3.02, 1.34, 1.36 and 1.62, while the proposed gETU metric for a  = 0.25 (greater emphasis on volume information) enabled significantly enhanced OS prediction with HR  =  3.94. For the pancreatic cancer dataset, MTV, TLG, SUVmax, SUVmean and SUVpeak resulted in HR values of 1.05, 1.25, 1.42, 1.45 and 1.52, while gETU at a  = 3.2 (greater emphasis on SUV information) arrived at an improved HR value of 1.61. Overall, the proposed methodology allows placement of differing degrees of emphasis on tumor volume versus uptake for different types of tumors to enable enhanced clinical outcome prediction.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedCarcinoma, Squamous CellFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansMaleMiddle AgedMultimodal ImagingOropharyngeal NeoplasmsPancreatic NeoplasmsPositron-Emission TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsTomography, X-Ray ComputedFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID26639024
PMCPMC4887091
OpenAlexW2194394814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.