Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26638780›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

mRNA Levels of Imprinted Genes in Bovine In Vivo Oocytes, Embryos and Cross Species Comparisons with Humans, Mice and Pigs.

Zongliang Jiang, Hong Dong, Xinbao Zheng, Sadie L Marjani, David M Donovan, Jingbo Chen, Xiuchun Cindy Tian

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Pre-Implantation Bovine Embryo Evaluation-From Optics to Omics and Beyond.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Establishment of bovine expanded potential stem cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Contributions of RNA-seq to improveAnimal reproduction · 2019
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Zongliang JiangCenter for Regenerative Biology, Department of Animal Science, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, 06269, USA.
Hong DongInstitute of Animal Science, Xinjiang Academy of Animal Science, Urumqi, Xinjiang, P.R. China.
Xinbao ZhengInstitute of Animal Science, Xinjiang Academy of Animal Science, Urumqi, Xinjiang, P.R. China.
Sadie L MarjaniDepartment of Biology, Central Connecticut State University, New Britain, Connecticut, 06050, USA.
David M DonovanAnimal Biosciences and Biotechnology Laboratory, Agricultural Research Services, United States Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, Maryland, 20705, USA.
Jingbo ChenInstitute of Animal Science, Xinjiang Academy of Animal Science, Urumqi, Xinjiang, P.R. China.
Xiuchun Cindy TianCenter for Regenerative Biology, Department of Animal Science, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, 06269, USA.
Xinjiang Academy of Animal Science · CNUniversity of Connecticut · USUnited States Department of Agriculture · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Twenty-six imprinted genes were quantified in bovine in vivo produced oocytes and embryos using RNA-seq. Eighteen were detectable and their transcriptional patterns were: largely decreased (MEST and PLAGL1); first decreased and then increased (CDKN1C and IGF2R); peaked at a specific stage (PHLDA2, SGCE, PEG10, PEG3, GNAS, MEG3, DGAT1, ASCL2, NNAT, and NAP1L5); or constantly low (DIRAS3, IGF2, H19 and RTL1). These patterns reflect mRNAs that are primarily degraded, important at a specific stage, or only required at low quantities. The mRNAs for several genes were surprisingly abundant. For instance, transcripts for the maternally imprinted MEST and PLAGL1, were high in oocytes and could only be expressed from the maternal allele suggesting that their genomic imprints were not yet established/recognized. Although the mRNAs detected here were likely biallelically transcribed before the establishment of imprinted expression, the levels of mRNA during these critical stages of development have important functional consequences. Lastly, we compared these genes to their counterparts in mice, humans and pigs. Apart from previously known differences in the imprinting status, the mRNA levels were different among these four species. The data presented here provide a solid reference for expression profiles of imprinted genes in embryos produced using assisted reproductive biotechnologies.

Indexed as

Genomic ImprintingAnimalsBlastocystCattleEmbryo, MammalianEmbryonic DevelopmentFemaleGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHumansMiceOocytesReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, MessengerSpecies SpecificitySus scrofaTranscription, GeneticRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID26638780
PMCPMC4671149
OpenAlexW2196463155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.