Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26638130›Full record

Trial reportRespirology (Carlton, Vic.)2016

Randomized controlled trial of the effect of regular paracetamol on influenza infection.

Sarah Jefferies, Irene Braithwaite, Steven Walker, Mark Weatherall, Lance Jennings, Michelle Luck, Kevin Barrett, Robert Siebers, Timothy Blackmore, Richard Beasley and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Respirology (Carlton, Vic.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah JefferiesMedical Research Institute of New Zealand, New Zealand, Wellington.
Irene BraithwaiteMedical Research Institute of New Zealand, New Zealand, Wellington.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5327-3027
Steven WalkerMedical Research Institute of New Zealand, New Zealand, Wellington.
Mark WeatherallDepartment of Medicine, University of Otago Wellington, New Zealand, Wellington.
Lance JenningsCanterbury Health Laboratories, Canterbury District Health Board, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Michelle LuckCanterbury Health Laboratories, Canterbury District Health Board, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Kevin BarrettCanterbury Health Laboratories, Canterbury District Health Board, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Robert SiebersDepartment of Medicine, University of Otago Wellington, New Zealand, Wellington.
Timothy BlackmoreCapital & Coast District Health Board, New Zealand, Wellington.
Richard BeasleyMedical Research Institute of New Zealand, New Zealand, Wellington.
Kyle PerrinMedical Research Institute of New Zealand, New Zealand, Wellington.
Pi Study Group
Capital and Coast District Health Board · NZCanterbury Health Laboratories · NZMedical Research Institute of New Zealand · NZUniversity of Otago · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveAnti-pyretic treatment is recommended in the management of influenza infection. In animal models anti-pyretic treatment increases mortality from influenza. We investigated the effects of paracetamol on viral and clinical outcomes in adults with influenza infection.

methodsThis is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of adults aged 18-65 years with influenza-like illness and positive influenza rapid antigen test. Treatments were 1 g paracetamol four times a day, or matching placebo, for 5 days. Pernasal swabs were taken for influenza quantitative RT-PCR at Baseline and Days 1, 2 and 5. Temperature and symptom scores were recorded for 5-14 days or time of resolution respectively. The primary outcome variable was area under the curve (AUC) for quantitative PCR log10 viral load from Baseline to Day 5.

resultsA total of 80 participants were randomized: no one was lost to follow up, and one withdrew after 4 days. There were 22 and 24 participants who were influenza PCR-positive in placebo and in paracetamol groups respectively. Mean (SD) AUC PCR log10 viral load was 4.40 (0.91) in placebo and 4.64 (0.88) in paracetamol; difference was -0.24, 95% CI: -0.78 to 0.29, P = 0.36. In all participants there were no differences in symptom scores, temperature, time to resolution of illness and health status, with no interaction between randomized treatment and whether influenza was detected by PCR.

conclusionRegular paracetamol had no effect on viral shedding, temperature or clinical symptoms in patients with PCR-confirmed influenza. There remains an insufficient evidence base for paracetamol use in influenza infection. CLINICAL

trial registrationACTRN12611000497909 at the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry.

Indexed as

AcetaminophenAdolescentAdultAntipyreticsArea Under CurveBody TemperatureDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHealth StatusHumansInfluenza, HumanMaleNoseSymptom AssessmentViral LoadVirus SheddingAcetaminophenAntipyreticsanti-pyresisinfluenzainfluenza-like illnessparacetamolrandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID26638130
PMCPMC4738455
OpenAlexW2194984387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.