Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26637380›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2016

How Many Samples and How Many Culture Media To Diagnose a Prosthetic Joint Infection: a Clinical and Microbiological Prospective Multicenter Study.

Pascale Bémer, Julie Léger, Didier Tandé, Chloé Plouzeau, Anne Sophie Valentin, Anne Jolivet-Gougeon, Carole Lemarié, Marie Kempf, Geneviève Héry-Arnaud, Laurent Bret and 5 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Contribution of sonication to the microbiology diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: Retrospective study of real-world data.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Enhancing Diagnostics in Orthopedic Infections.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Pascale BémerCHU Nantes, Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Nantes, France pascale.bemer@chu-nantes.fr.
Julie LégerInserm, CIC 1415, Tours, France.
Didier TandéCHU Brest, Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Brest, France.
Chloé PlouzeauCHU Poitiers, Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Poitiers, France.
Anne Sophie ValentinCHU Tours, Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Tours, France.
Anne Jolivet-GougeonCHU Rennes, Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Rennes, France.
Carole LemariéCHU Angers, Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Angers, France.
Marie KempfCHU Angers, Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Angers, France.
Geneviève Héry-ArnaudCHU Brest, Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Brest, France.
Laurent BretCH Orléans, Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Orléans, France.
Marie Emmanuelle JuvinCHU Nantes, Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Nantes, France.
Bruno GiraudeauInserm, CIC 1415, Tours, France.
Stéphane CorvecCHU Nantes, Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Nantes, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3176-8111
Christophe BurucoaCHU Poitiers, Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Poitiers, France.
Centre de Référence des Infections Ostéo-articulaires du Grand Ouest (CRIOGO) Study Team

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although numerous perioperative samples and culture media are required to diagnose prosthetic joint infection (PJI), their exact number and types have not yet been definitely determined with a high level of proof. We conducted a prospective multicenter study to determine the minimal number of samples and culture media required for accurate diagnosis of PJI. Over a 2-year period, consecutive patients with clinical signs suggesting PJI were included, with five perioperative samples per patient. The bacteriological and PJI diagnosis criteria were assessed using a random selection of two, three, or four samples and compared with those obtained using the recommended five samples (references guidelines). The results obtained with two or three culture media were then compared with those obtained with five culture media for both criteria. The times-to-positivity of the different culture media were calculated. PJI was confirmed in 215/264 suspected cases, with a bacteriological criterion in 192 (89%). The PJI was monomicrobial (85%) or polymicrobial (15%). Percentages of agreement of 98.1% and 99.7%, respectively, for the bacteriological criterion and confirmed PJI diagnosis were obtained when four perioperative samples were considered. The highest percentages of agreement were obtained with the association of three culture media, a blood culture bottle, a chocolate agar plate, and Schaedler broth, incubated for 5, 7, and 14 days, respectively. This new procedure leads to significant cost saving. Our prospective multicenter study showed that four samples seeded on three culture media are sufficient for diagnosing PJI.

Indexed as

ArthritisBacteriological TechniquesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansMaleProsthesis-Related InfectionsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID26637380
PMCPMC4733176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.