Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26637222›Full record

Trial reportBMC geriatrics2015

The long-term effect of being treated in a geriatric ward compared to an orthopaedic ward on six measures of free-living physical behavior 4 and 12 months after a hip fracture - a randomised controlled trial.

Kristin Taraldsen, Pernille Thingstad, Olav Sletvold, Ingvild Saltvedt, Stian Lydersen, Malcolm H Granat, Sebastien Chastin, Jorunn L Helbostad

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC geriatrics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00667914 (A New Clinical Pathway for Patients With Fractured Neck of Femur - The Orthopedics Operate, the Geriatricians Manage the Medical Work-up), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00667914 nacompletednot on this map

A New Clinical Pathway for Patients With Fractured Neck of Femur - The Orthopedics Operate, the Geriatricians Manage the Medical Work-up

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyRan2008 to 2013Enrolled397ConditionsHip Fracture, AgedArmsgeriatric work-up, Orthopedic care as usual
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for older people with hip fractures.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Evaluation of mobility recovery after hip fracture: a scoping review of randomized controlled studies.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Change of physical activity parameters of hip and pelvic fracture patients during inpatient rehabilitation and after discharge: analysis of global and in-depth parameters.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Sedentary Behaviour in Hospitalised Older People: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kristin TaraldsenDepartment of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and technology, N-7491, Trondheim, Norway. kristin.taraldsen@ntnu.no.
Pernille ThingstadDepartment of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and technology, N-7491, Trondheim, Norway. pernille.thingstad@ntnu.no.
Olav SletvoldDepartment of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and technology, N-7491, Trondheim, Norway. olav.sletvold@ntnu.no.
Ingvild SaltvedtDepartment of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and technology, N-7491, Trondheim, Norway. ingvild.saltvedt@ntnu.no.
Stian LydersenRegional Centre for Child and Youth Mental health and Child Welfare, Norwegian University of Science and technology, N-7491, Trondheim, Norway. stian.lydersen@ntnu.no.
Malcolm H GranatSchool of Health Sciences, University of Salford, Manchester, M5 4WT, UK. m.h.granat@salford.ac.uk.
Sebastien ChastinSchool of Health and Life Science, Institute of Applied Health Research, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland, UK. Sebastien.Chastin@gcu.ac.uk.
Jorunn L HelbostadDepartment of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and technology, N-7491, Trondheim, Norway. jorunn.helbostad@ntnu.no.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study is part of the Trondheim Hip Fracture Trial, where we compared free-living physical behavior in daily life 4 and 12 months following hip surgery for patients managed with comprehensive geriatric care (CGC) in a geriatric ward with those managed with orthopedic care (OC) in an orthopedic ward.

methodsThis is a single centre, prospective, randomized controlled trial. 397 hip fracture patients were randomized to CGC (n = 199) or OC (n = 198) in the Emergency Department with follow-up assessments performed four and 12 months post-surgery. Outcomes were mean upright time, number and length of upright events recorded continuously for four days at four and 12 months post-surgery by an accelerometer-based activity monitor. Missing data were handled by multiple imputation and group differences assessed by linear regression with adjustments for gender, age and fracture type.

resultsThere were no group differences in participants' pre-fracture characteristics. Estimated group difference in favor of CGC in upright time at 4 months was 34.6 min (17.4 %, CI 9.6 to 59.6, p = .007) and at 12 months, 27.7 min (13.9 %, CI 3.5 to 51.8, p = .025). Average and maximum length of upright events was longer in the CGC (p's < .042). No group difference was found for number of upright events (p's > .452).

conclusionParticipants treated with CGC during the hospital stay improved free-living physical behavior more than those treated with OC both 4 and 12 months after surgery, with more time and longer periods spent in upright. Results support findings from the same study for functional outcomes, and demonstrate that CGC impacts daily life as long as one year after surgery. TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00667914 , April 18, 2008.

Indexed as

Fracture FixationHip FracturesPatient Care ManagementAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHealth Services for the AgedHospitalizationHumansLength of StayMaleOrthopedicsOutcome Assessment, Health CarePostoperative PeriodProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID26637222
PMCPMC4670513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.