Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26637175›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Time to Integrate to Nest Test Evaluation in a Mouse DSS-Colitis Model.

Christine Häger, Lydia M Keubler, Svenja Biernot, Jana Dietrich, Stephanie Buchheister, Manuela Buettner, André Bleich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Grimace scale assessment duringFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Morphine Exacerbates Experimental Colitis-Induced Depression of Nesting in Mice.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Tell-tale TINT: Does the Time to Incorporate into Nest Test Evaluate Postsurgical Pain or Welfare in Mice?Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2020
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christine HägerInstitute of Laboratory Animal Science and Central Animal Facility, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Lydia M KeublerInstitute of Laboratory Animal Science and Central Animal Facility, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Svenja BiernotInstitute of Laboratory Animal Science and Central Animal Facility, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Jana DietrichInstitute of Laboratory Animal Science and Central Animal Facility, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Stephanie BuchheisterInstitute of Laboratory Animal Science and Central Animal Facility, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Manuela BuettnerInstitute of Laboratory Animal Science and Central Animal Facility, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
André BleichInstitute of Laboratory Animal Science and Central Animal Facility, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severity assessment in laboratory animals is an important issue regarding the implementation of the 3R concept into biomedical research and pivotal in current EU regulations. In mouse models of inflammatory bowel disease severity assessment is usually undertaken by clinical scoring, especially by monitoring reduction of body weight. This requires daily observance and handling of each mouse, which is time consuming, stressful for the animal and necessitates an experienced observer. The time to integrate to nest test (TINT) is an easily applicable test detecting disturbed welfare by measuring the time interval mice need to integrate nesting material to an existing nest. Here, TINT was utilized to assess severity in a mouse DSS-colitis model. TINT results depended on the group size of mice maintained per cage with most consistent time intervals measured when co-housing 4 to 5 mice. Colitis was induced with 1% or 1.5% DSS in group-housed WT and Cd14-deficient mice. Higher clinical scores and loss of body weight were detected in 1.5% compared to 1% DSS treated mice. TINT time intervals showed no dose dependent differences. However, increased clinical scores, body weight reductions, and increased TINT time intervals were detected in Cd14-/- compared to WT mice revealing mouse strain related differences. Therefore, TINT is an easily applicable method for severity assessment in a mouse colitis model detecting CD14 related differences, but not dose dependent differences. As TINT revealed most consistent results in group-housed mice, we recommend utilization as an additional method substituting clinical monitoring of the individual mouse.

Indexed as

AnimalsColitisDextran SulfateDisease Models, AnimalLipopolysaccharide ReceptorsMiceMice, KnockoutNesting BehaviorDextran SulfateLipopolysaccharide Receptors

Identifiers

PMID26637175
PMCPMC4670219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.