Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26637054›Full record

ArticlemAbs2016

VH-VL orientation prediction for antibody humanization candidate selection: A case study.

Alexander Bujotzek, Florian Lipsmeier, Seth F Harris, Jörg Benz, Andreas Kuglstatter, Guy Georges

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mAbs, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Data-optimal scaling of paired antibody language models.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Affinity targeting of therapeutic proteins to the bone surface-local delivery of sclerostin-neutralizing antibody enhances efficacy.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Defining and Studying B Cell Receptor and TCR Interactions.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. VProteins · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexander Bujotzeka Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Large Molecule Research, Roche Innovation Center Penzberg , Nonnenwald 2, Penzberg , Germany.
Florian Lipsmeierb Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Informatics, Roche Innovation Center Penzberg , Nonnenwald 2, Penzberg , Germany.
Seth F Harrisc Genentech, Inc., Structural Biology Department , 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco , California 94080 , USA.
Jörg Benzd Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Small Molecule Research, Roche Innovation Center Basel , Grenzacherstrasse 124, Basel , Switzerland.
Andreas Kuglstatterd Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Small Molecule Research, Roche Innovation Center Basel , Grenzacherstrasse 124, Basel , Switzerland.
Guy Georgesa Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Large Molecule Research, Roche Innovation Center Penzberg , Nonnenwald 2, Penzberg , Germany.
Roche (Switzerland) · CHRoche Pharma AG (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibody humanization describes the procedure of grafting a non-human antibody's complementarity-determining regions, i.e., the variable loop regions that mediate specific interactions with the antigen, onto a β-sheet framework that is representative of the human variable region germline repertoire, thus reducing the number of potentially antigenic epitopes that might trigger an anti-antibody response. The selection criterion for the so-called acceptor frameworks (one for the heavy and one for the light chain variable region) is traditionally based on sequence similarity. Here, we propose a novel approach that selects acceptor frameworks such that the relative orientation of the 2 variable domains in 3D space, and thereby the geometry of the antigen-binding site, is conserved throughout the process of humanization. The methodology relies on a machine learning-based predictor of antibody variable domain orientation that has recently been shown to improve the quality of antibody homology models. Using data from 3 humanization campaigns, we demonstrate that preselecting humanization variants based on the predicted difference in variable domain orientation with regard to the original antibody leads to subsets of variants with a significant improvement in binding affinity.

Indexed as

Machine LearningModels, MolecularAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedComplementarity Determining RegionsHumansProtein Structure, SecondaryStructural Homology, ProteinAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedComplementarity Determining Regionsantibody humanizationantibody variable domain orientationCDR graftingmonoclonal antibody

Identifiers

PMID26637054
PMCPMC4966660
OpenAlexW2263209021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.