Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26636771›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

'He is the one who is providing you with everything so whatever he says is what you do': A Qualitative Study on Factors Affecting Secondary Schoolgirls' Dropout in Rural Western Kenya.

Kelvin Oruko, Elizabeth Nyothach, Emily Zielinski-Gutierrez, Linda Mason, Kelly Alexander, John Vulule, Kayla F Laserson, Penelope A Phillips-Howard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Menstrual Equity: A Survey Study with ZIP-Code Level Analysis.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kelvin OrukoKenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Center for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya.
Elizabeth NyothachKenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Center for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya.
Emily Zielinski-GutierrezCenter for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
Linda MasonDepartment of Clinical Studies, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Kelly AlexanderDepartment of Clinical Studies, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
John VululeKenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Center for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya.
Kayla F LasersonCenter for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
Penelope A Phillips-HowardKenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Center for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya.

Funding

Medical Research Council G1100677
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Education is an effective way to improve girls' self-worth, health, and productivity; however there remains a gender gap between girls' and boys' completion of school. The literature around factors influencing girls' decision to stay in school is limited. Seven focus group discussions took place among 79 girls in forms 2 to 4 at secondary schools in rural western Kenya, to examine their views on why girls absent themselves or dropout from school. Data were analysed thematically. Lack of resources, sexual relationships with boyfriends, and menstrual care problems were reported to lead directly to dropout or school absence. These were tied to girls increased vulnerability to pregnancy, poor performance in school, and punishments, which further increase school absence and risk of dropout. Poverty, unmet essential needs, coercive sexual relationships, and an inequitable school environment collude to counter girls' resolve to complete their schooling. Lack of resources drive girls to have sex with boyfriends or men who provide them with essentials their family cannot afford, such as sanitary pads and transport to school. While these improve quality of their school life, this dynamic increases their exposure to sexual risk, pregnancy, punishment, and dropout. Evaluation of interventions to ameliorate these challenges is warranted, including provision of pocket money to address their needs.

Indexed as

Rural PopulationAdolescentFemaleHumansKenyaMalePregnancyPregnancy in AdolescencePregnancy, UnwantedSocioeconomic FactorsStudent Dropouts

Identifiers

PMID26636771
PMCPMC4670214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.