ReviewSpringerPlus2015
Operative versus non-operative treatment in complex proximal humeral fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Review in SpringerPlus, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison between arthroplasty and non-operative treatment for proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Complications after non-surgical management of proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review of terms and definitions.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2019Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Locking Plate Fixation versus Nonoperative Management in Patients Aged ≥65 Years with Proximal Humerus Fractures: Clinical and Functional Outcomes from a Retrospective Cohort Study.Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni · 2026Article
- Delphi method consensus on radiographic characteristics influencing management decisions for proximal humerus fracture.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Proximal humerus fractures: Treatment controversies.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2025Article
- Conservative Versus Operative Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fractures in Older Individuals.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2024Article
- Study on the characteristics of increased mechanical stiffness according to changes in LCP shape to reinforce clavicle fractures.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Long-stemmed Hemiarthroplasty with Cerclage Wiring for the Treatment of Split-Head Fractures of the Proximal Humerus with Metaphyseal Extension: A Report of 2 Cases.Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty · 2022Article
- Is antegrade nailing a proper option in 2- and 3-part proximal humeral fractures?Musculoskeletal surgery · 2020Review
- High-Energy Proximal Humerus Fractures in Geriatric Patients: A Review.Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation · 2020Review
- Readmissions, revisions, and mortality after treatment for proximal humeral fractures in three large states.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2019Article
- The Photodynamic Bone Stabilization System in the Treatment of Humerus Fractures: A Prospective Clinical Trial.Cureus · 2018Article
- [Orthogeriatrics].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2017Review
- Early-stage radiological critical analysis of unsuccessful cases following a four-part fracture osteosynthesis of the proximal humerus: focus on the "P" sign.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2017Article
- Surgical management of complex proximal humeral fractures: pinning, locked plate and arthroplasty : Clinical results and functional outcome on retrospective series of patients.Musculoskeletal surgery · 2017Article
- To operate or not to operate, that is the question: The proximal humerus fracture.Bone & joint research · 2016Article
- Trials based on specific fracture configuration and surgical procedures likely to be more relevant for decision making in the management of fractures of the proximal humerus: Findings of a meta-analysis.Bone & joint research · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Whether operative treatment for complex proximal humeral fractures (CPHFs) has a greater benefit over non-operative treatment remains controversial. There is no consensus on the optimal treatment in elderly patients with CPHFs. This updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aims to investigate whether operative treatment is superior to non-operative treatment in CPHFs. The authors searched RCTs in the electronic databases (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, Embase, Springer Link, Web of Knowledge, OVID and Google Scholar) from their establishment to July 2015. Researches on operative and non-operative treatment for CPHFs were selected in this meta-analysis. The quality of all studies was assessed and effective data was pooled for this meta-analysis. Outcome measurements were functional status include constant scores (CS scores) and disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand scores (DASH scores), total complication rates and healthy-related quality of life. The meta-analysis was performed with software revman 5.3. Nine articles with a total 518 patients (average age 70.93) met inclusion criteria. Patients were followed up for at least 1 year in all the studies. No statistical differences were found between operative and non-operative treatment in CS scores at 12 mo (months) [MD 1.06 95 % CI (-3.51, 5.62)] and 24 mo [MD -0.61 95 % CI (-5.87, 4.65)]. There are also no statistical differences between operative and non-operative treatment in DASH scores at 12 mo [MD -4.51 95 % CI (-13.49, 4.47)] and 24 mo [MD -7.43 95 % CI (-16.14, 1.27)]. Statistical differences were found between operative and non-operative treatment in total complication rates [RR 1.55, 95 % CI (1.24, 1.94)]. Statistical differences in EQ-5D at 24 mo [MD 0.15, 95 % CI (0.05, 0.24)] were found between operative and non-operative treatment but no statistical differences were found in ED-5D at 12 mo [MD 0.08, 95 % CI (-0.01, 0.17)], 15D at 12 mo [MD 0.02, 95 % CI (-0.68, 0.73)] and 15D at 24 mo [MD 0.02, 95 % CI (-0.07, 0.83)]. Operative treatments did not significantly improve the functional outcome and healthy-related quality of life in elderly patients. Instead, Operative treatment for CPHFs led to higher incidence of postoperative complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.